The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti : $b A summary of the outstanding testimonyBernheimer, Louis
History
The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti : $b A summary of the outstanding testimony
Bernheimer, Louis
Sacco-Vanzetti Trial, Dedham, Mass., 1921
The other evidence from which the “consciousness of guilt” was
drawn Sacco and Vanzetti admitted. They acknowledged that they
behaved in the way described by Mrs. Johnson, and freely stated that
when questioned at the police station they told lies. What is the
explanation of this conduct?
Plainly, their arrest meant to Sacco and Vanzetti arrest for
radicalism, for when apprehended they were not confronted with the
charge of murder. They were told they were arrested as “suspicious
characters.” But why did that scare them into telling lies?
The early winter of 1919-20 saw the beginning of the infamous
campaign by the Department of Justice, under Attorney General
Mitchell Palmer, for the wholesale arrest and deportation of Reds.
The details of these raids, their brutality and their lawlessness,
are set forth authoritatively in decisions of the United States
courts, condemning the misconduct of the Department of Justice.
Boston was one of the worst centers of lawlessness. One of the
leading citizens of Boston, Mr. John F. Moors, himself a banker,
has called attention to the fact that “the hysteria against the
Reds was so great at the time when these men were convicted that
even the most substantial bankers in this city were carried away
to the extent of paying for full page advertisements about the Red
peril.”
Now, Sacco and Vanzetti were notorious Reds. They were associates
of leading radicals. They had for some time been on the list
of suspects of the Department of Justice, and were especially
obnoxious because they had evaded the draft. Not only were they
living in an overwhelming atmosphere of apprehension, but also
the terrorizing methods of the Government had a very real meaning
to them. For, as mentioned above, two of their friends had been
deported, and one, Salsedo had, they had learned the day before,
after having been detained incommunicado by the Department of
Justice for a long period of time, been thrown or jumped from a
window of a building on Park Row, New York. Sacco and Vanzetti had
been urged by their friends to dispose of their radical literature
and thus eliminate the most damaging evidence in the deportation
proceedings they feared. It was to carry out this advice that
Vanzetti and his friends were trying to get Boda’s car from
Johnson’s garage on May 5th. And we cannot avoid concluding that
Sacco and Vanzetti’s actions after their arrest were dictated, not
by fear of arrest for murder, but by fear of deportation, or worse,
for radicalism.
We have seen the Commonwealth abandon its first line of attack. It
now abandons its second, and finally we shall see how, depending
entirely upon its third line, it succeeds, through the cooperation
of Judge, District Attorney, and firearms expert, in bamboozling
the jury, already eager to convict these Reds, into believing that
the “mortal bullet” actually passed through Sacco’s pistol.
[Sidenote: III.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account