The troubadours : $b A history of Provençal life and literature in the middle agesHueffer, Francis
History
The troubadours : $b A history of Provençal life and literature in the middle ages
Hueffer, Francis
Provençal poetry -- History and criticism; Troubadours
Next follow the usual compliments to his protector, and, this duty
discharged, Guiraut begins to speak from the fulness of his heart. ‘You
know,’ he says, ‘that all men live in classes differing and distinguished
from each other. Therefore it seems to me that such a distinction of
name ought also to be made amongst the Joglars; for it is unjust that
the best of them should not be distinguished by name as well as they
are by deed. It is unfair that an ignorant man of small learning, who
knows a little how to play some instrument and strums it in public places
for whatever people will give him, or one who sings low ditties to low
people about the streets and taverns, and takes alms without shame from
the first comer—that all these should indiscriminately go by the name of
Joglars.... For joglaria was invented by wise men, to give joy to good
people by their skill in playing on instruments.... After that came the
Troubadours to record valiant deeds, and to praise the good and encourage
them in their noble endeavour.... But in our days and for some time
past a set of people without sense and wisdom have undertaken to sing
and compose stanzas, and play on instruments ... and their jealousy is
roused when they see honour done to the good and noble.’ Every one, he
reasons, ought to be named according to the work he does, and it would be
quite just, he characteristically adds, to apply the name of Joglars to
all poets and singers indiscriminately if they were all more or less of
the same kind and worth, like common citizens. This, however, is not the
case, and the good suffer by being mixed up with the low and vulgar.
To check this confusion by a tangible sign, to distinguish by an
acknowledged name and title the trickster and player of instruments, who
flatters the senses by momentary enjoyment, from the learned and serious
poet whose works are graven on the memory and long survive their author,
to do this and save poetry from impending ruin, Guiraut says, is a worthy
task for the wise and noble King Alfonso.
The king’s answer to this request is extant. It is written in verse,
but otherwise composed with all the gravity of a state paper, and at
the same time with a lucidity of argument rarely found in mediæval
writings. ‘Although,’ the king justly remarks, ‘it is unwise and of
dangerous consequence to speak about the affairs of strangers, yet he
who holds honour dear, and possesses sense and wisdom and power withal,
ought to consider the interests of others together with his own.’ After
this cautious beginning, the king fully admits the reason of Guiraut’s
complaint, and points out the injustice of comprising all the members of
the poetic, musical, and histrionic professions under the common title
of Joglar, a word which the king learnedly adds is derived from the
Latin _joculator_, and therefore is wholly unfit to designate the higher
branches of the art of poetry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account