Authors, English -- 20th century -- Biography; Bennett, Arnold, 1867-1931
"There's no money in it," the publisher repeated, firmly. "First books
are too risky. . . . I should like to publish it."
"Well?" I said, and paused. I felt that he had withdrawn within himself
in order to ponder upon the chances of this terrible risk. So as not to
incommode him with my gaze, I examined the office, which resembled a
small drawing-room rather than an office. I saw around me signed
portraits of all the roaring lions on the sunny side of Grub Street.
"I'll publish it," said the publisher, and I believe he made an honest
attempt not to look like a philanthropist; however, the attempt failed.
"I'll publish it. But of course I can only give you a small royalty."
"What royalty?" I asked.
"Five per cent.--on a three-and-six-penny book."
"Very well. Thank you!" I said.
"I'll give you fifteen per cent, after the sale of five thousand
copies," he added kindly.
O ironist!
I emerged from the web of the spider triumphant, an accepted author.
Exactly ten days had elapsed since I had first parted with my
manuscript. Once again life was plagiarizing fiction. I could not
believe that this thing was true. I simply could not believe it. "Oh!" I
reflected, incredulous, "Something's bound to happen. It can't really
come off. The publisher might die, and then----"
Protected by heaven on account of his good deeds, the publisher
felicitously survived; and after a delay of twelve months (twelve
centuries--during which I imagined that the universe hung motionless and
expectant in the void!) he accomplished his destiny by really and truly
publishing my book.
The impossible had occurred. I was no longer a mere journalist; I was an
author.
"After all, it's nothing!" I said, with that intense and unoriginal
humanity which distinguishes all of us. And in a blinding flash I saw
that an author was in essence the same thing as a grocer or a duke.
IX
My novel, under a new title, was published both in England and America.
I actually collected forty-one reviews, of it, and there must have been
many that escaped me. Of these forty-one, four were unfavourable, eleven
mingled praise and blame in about equal proportions, and twenty-six were
unmistakably favourable, a few of them being enthusiastic.
Yet I had practically no friends on the press. One friend I had, a man
of power, and he reviewed my book with an appreciation far too kind; but
his article came as a complete surprise to me. Another friend I had,
sub-editor of a society weekly, and he asked me for a copy of my book so
that he might "look after it" in the paper. Here is part of the result:
"He has all the young novelist's faults. . . . These are glaring faults;
for, given lack of interest, and unpleasant scenes, how can a book be
expected to be popular?"
A third friend I had, who knew the chief fiction-reviewer on a great
morning paper. He asked me for a special copy of my book, and quite on
his own initiative, undertook to arrange the affair. Here is part of the
result:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account