The Truth about Church Extension: An exposure of certain fallacies and misstatements contained in the census reports on religious worship and education — John Shaqi
The Truth about Church Extension: An exposure of certain fallacies and misstatements contained in the census reports on religious worship and educationAnonymous
History
The Truth about Church Extension: An exposure of certain fallacies and misstatements contained in the census reports on religious worship and education
Anonymous
Church attendance -- Great Britain; Church of England; Great Britain -- Census, 1851
Looking at all the facts of the case, there is every reason why the
Church should take courage. Never since the Reformation has she had so
much real power for good—never has she been so free from abuses. Each
year sees thousands returning to the fold from which they or their
parents had strayed; each year sees her enemies more and more “dwindle,
peak, and pine.” Everything, too, points to a daily acceleration of the
process. At the very time that Convocation is resuming its functions,
the Non-conformist Union is compelled by internal dissentions to abandon
their yearly meeting. What Mr. Miall calls “the dissidence of
dissent”—that is to say, all in it that is pre-eminently narrow-minded,
ignorant, and infected with bigotry—is concentrating itself, and is thus
getting free the more respectable elements of modern non-conformity.
Meanwhile the better class of Dissenters are doing all in their power to
cut the ground from under their own feet. They are building
“steeple-houses,” inventing liturgies, and adopting even choral services;
in other words they are expressing in the most emphatic manner their
opinion that the whole theory of dissent is wrong. For a short time a
Brummagem ecclesiology may satisfy them; but in the end they will no
doubt rank themselves amongst the best sons of the Church. The truth is,
there is no other religious community at the present day which can bid so
high for the reverent attachment of Englishmen. Whatever the claims of
Rome—her antiquity, her catholicity, her apostolicity—they are equally
the Church of England’s. Her succession of bishops is the same, her
regard for the primitive church greater, her conception of Christendom
far more grand. The glories of the ancient rituals belong equally to the
Book of Common Prayer. It contains nothing material which was not in
them, there was nothing material in them (save only certain invocations
and legends of the saints) which is not in it. The Prayer Book is, in
fact, nothing but a translation (magnificently done) of the older
offices, a little compressed and simplified. The structure is the
same—the mode of using it the same; and if it has lost somewhat of the
multiplied ceremonies which were anciently observed, it has gained far
more in the majesty and breadth which it has acquired from its thoroughly
congregational character. Besides, it is throughout a reality, whereas
the office books of the Latin Communion have, to some extent at least,
become a sham. Thus the Breviary has long since been practically
abolished as a public form of prayer, and even as a manual of private
devotions for the clergy, that which forms its staple, the Book of
Psalms, has been virtually reduced to a fourth its bulk. In nearly a
thousand churches belonging to the Anglican communion the whole Psalter
is publicly recited every month, and in twenty times that number it is
said through twice every year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account