The Truth about Church Extension: An exposure of certain fallacies and misstatements contained in the census reports on religious worship and educationAnonymous
History
The Truth about Church Extension: An exposure of certain fallacies and misstatements contained in the census reports on religious worship and education
Anonymous
Church attendance -- Great Britain; Church of England; Great Britain -- Census, 1851
If Protestant Dissenters boast of their enlightenment or of their
reverence for Scripture, the Church may meet them on that ground likewise
with the utmost confidence. The Prayer-book scarcely recognises a person
to be a Churchman if he cannot read; and she directs some forty psalms
and some thirty chapters of the Bible to be gone through every week. In
a word, approach the Church of England from the most opposite points, and
she will be found to possess exactly that attribute which a person might
think is most admirable. The man who reverences antiquity—who has a
taste for art—who has a passion for ritual—who would have everything
“understanded of the people,”—he who insists upon ranks and orders—and he
who stands up for popular rights, will equally find in the Church of this
country the very quality which he deems important. Never was there any
institution so “many-sided;” never one that became with so much success
“all things to all men.” How she could ever have lost her hold on the
affections of Englishmen is indeed wonderful; but, in truth, until
lately, she has never had a chance of making herself understood. _Now_,
for the first time, her theory is beginning to be appreciated; and the
success which has attended her, wonderful as it has been, is probably but
the foretaste of a future more brilliant than anything of which we can
now form an idea.
FOOTNOTES.
{11} The above tables, it is right to say, have been obtained by
subtracting Mr. Mann’s tables relating to the Church from the tables
relating to places of worship in the aggregate.
{19} It is right to say that the decennial periods do not exactly agree.
In Mr. Mann’s tables they are from 1801–11, &c.; in Mr. Bright’s return,
from 1800–10, &c. It is not, however, apprehended that this circumstance
would materially affect the calculation.
{25} Neale estimates the Nonconformists, in the time of Charles II., at
a hundred and fifty thousand families, or three quarters of a million
persons; in other words, at about a sixth of the population. If the
Dissenters had in 1801 only 881,240 sittings, their number of morning
attendants would be considerably less than 400,000; and, allowing each
attendant to represent three persons, that would give a Dissenting
population of about 1,100,000.
{26} The faculty of reasoning correctly in figures is not so ordinary an
accomplishment as might have been supposed. Even so intelligent a writer
as Mr. Henry Mayhew prints, at page 391 of his “Great World of London,” a
table, of which the following is a specimen:—
1842. Can neither Can read
read nor only (percent)
write (percent).
Convicted at assizes 39.79 27.21
and sessions
Convicted—summarily 39.90 21.65
Average 39.84 24.43
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account