The Truth About Lynching and the Negro in the South: In Which the Author Pleads That the South Be Made Safe for the White RaceCollins, Winfield H. (Winfield Hazlitt)
History
The Truth About Lynching and the Negro in the South: In Which the Author Pleads That the South Be Made Safe for the White Race
Collins, Winfield H. (Winfield Hazlitt)
African Americans; Lynching; Southern States -- Race relations
Again, in extenuation of lynching, it is important to observe, that, as
a result of most crimes against the body, such as murder, but little,
if any, humiliation attaches. But it is quite different in rape cases.
Not only is there often great physical injury, but also an unutterable
humiliation. Our civilization teaches that one should hold certain
personal rights and considerations even more dear than life itself. To
have in mind such ideas and live up to them measures our reach above
lower peoples. That this feeling or spirit should be encouraged, rather
than risk its check, is not to be questioned. Therefore, the average
Southern white man does not believe that the innocent rape victim of a
Negro should be obliged to endure further humiliation incident upon
her appearance in a court of law.
In this connection, a set of resolutions published by those who lynched
a Negro at Annapolis, Md., in 1875, are interesting. These resolutions,
which set forth the causes of the act, were drawn up before the
lynching took place and show serious consideration. I quote:[56:4]
“Fellow Citizens: In view of the fact that we are about to take
into our hands the sword of justice to do to death one who is
now incarcerated in our county jail, it is meet that we should
give some reason for the purpose we hope to consummate. First,
then: While we can but honor the deep feeling of interest
manifested by those who are the proper guardians of our lives,
our property, and our honor; and while we, as true and loyal
citizens of the State of Maryland, and of Anne Arundel County,
do bend to the supreme majesty of the law and acknowledge
trials by jury as the very arch-stone in the grand edifice of
human rights, still we know the vilest criminal is accorded
the same rights under the law that belong to the petty thief,
nor can this devil incarnate, should he claim his rights, be
denied the privilege of a change of venue, such a circumstance
might probably rob the gallows of its due and foil the aims
of the law. Before God we believe in the existence of a higher
code than that which is dignified by the great seal of a
Commonwealth and that the high and holy time to exercise it is
when the chastity of our women is tarnished by the foul breath
of an imp from hell and the sanctity of our homes invaded by a
demon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account