The Truth About Lynching and the Negro in the South: In Which the Author Pleads That the South Be Made Safe for the White RaceCollins, Winfield H. (Winfield Hazlitt)
History
The Truth About Lynching and the Negro in the South: In Which the Author Pleads That the South Be Made Safe for the White Race
Collins, Winfield H. (Winfield Hazlitt)
African Americans; Lynching; Southern States -- Race relations
[81:3] My statistics are based on the census of 1910. The Special
Report of the Prison Inspector of Alabama for the year ending September
30, 1914, and the returns of the county jails of Connecticut for
the same period. As the white population of Connecticut increased
about 225,000 during the previous decade, while the Negroes slightly
decreased, I added 70,000 to the white population of 1910 to offset
the increase of whites during the three or four years between 1910 and
1914. But as both races increased in Alabama I use the 1910 census for
that State.
[81:4] In proportion to their respective population, of course.
[81:5] In order to avoid repetition, unless otherwise indicated, when
one white to four Negroes or any such ratio is mentioned, the meaning
is this: I divide the white population of the state by the white
prisoners for the number of white people to each white prisoner, and
divide the Negro population of the State for the number of Negroes to
each Negro prisoner, and then divide the white prisoners by the Negro
to get the ratio of Negro prisoners to the white.
[85:7] I made no effort to find these. I give here only a few of those
taken from _Baltimore Sun_, _Baltimore American_, and refer mainly to
Maryland, Virginia, and Delaware. What may be true in these States as
regards Negro criminality, is likely to be found intensified farther
south.
[86:8] _Baltimore Sun_, Jan. 6, 1910.
[86:9] _Baltimore News_, Oct. 20, 1916.
[87:10] _Baltimore Sun_, Aug. 4, 1915.
[87:11] _Ibid._, April 8, 1910.
[87:12] _Ibid._, Sept. 12, 1917.
[88:13] _Baltimore American_, Feb. 18, 1913.
[88:14] _Baltimore Sun_, Jan. 8, 1917.
[88:15] _Ibid._, Feb. 21, 1917.
[89:16] _Baltimore Weekly Herald_, July 8, 1909.
[89:17] _Baltimore Sun_, Aug. 15, 1914.
[90:18] _Cambridge_ (Md.) _Record_, Sept. 12, 1913.
[90:19] _Baltimore Sun_, March 30, 1910.
[91:20] _Baltimore Sun_, Aug. 10, 1915.
[91:21] _Ibid._, Sept. 7, 1915.
[91:22] _Cambridge_ (Md.) _Record_, Aug. 25, 1913.
[94:23] _Methodist Protestant_, July 28, 1909.
[99:24] _Philadelphia Record_, May 8, 1916.
CHAPTER V
SEGREGATION OF THE NEGRO
It is hardly to be questioned that since the Civil War the white man
and the Negro have been drawing farther and farther apart. Religious
teachers, political adventurers, and fortune hunters gave the first
great impetus to the movement. The teachers, however, misguided, may
have been sincere in their efforts to benefit the Negro; but the
carpet-baggers had in mind only personal aggrandizement.
This political separation of the Negroes from the Southern whites was
the entering wedge that split asunder the ties that had bound the two
races together. Otherwise the Negroes might have divided with the
whites between two or more political parties. This would have resulted
greatly to their advantage for each party would have bid for their vote.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account