Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
Finally, the following letter of M. Koudashev to M. Sazonov, Minister
of Foreign Affairs, printed in the collection of secret documents of
the Russian Foreign Office published in December, 1917,[57] shows how
deeply the leaders of Russia and the Russian people had this question
at heart, that it commanded all their foreign policy, and that they
were determined to use any means, to resort to any artifice, in order
to solve it in conformity with their wishes. No wonder, then, as we
pointed out at the beginning of this book, that Turkey, being fully
aware of the Russian enmity, should have consented to stand by the side
of Germany in a war in which her very existence was at stake.
IMPERIAL HEADQUARTERS,
_February_ 5, 1916 (o.s.).
“Most honoured Serguey Dmitrievich,—At the request of General
Alexiev, I waited on him to discuss how the capture of Erzerum
could be best exploited.
“Such an event obviously points to a certain state of mind in
Turkey which we should turn to account. If a separate peace with
Turkey was to be contemplated, it should be borne in mind that
such favourable circumstances are not likely to occur again within
a long time. It would undoubtedly be our advantage to start the
negotiations after a victory which the enemy rightly or wrongly
fears will be attended with a new catastrophe.
“Considering that our forces on the secondary front of Caucasus
are insignificant and it is impossible to take away one soldier
from the chief centre of operations, it would be most difficult, in
General Alexiev’s opinion, to derive full profit from the glorious
success of our Caucasian army in a strictly military sense.
“Though he does not wish to advocate an immediate peace with
Turkey, the general desires me to bring to your knowledge some of
his views concerning this eventuality that the situation created by
our recent success may be carefully considered and fully utilised.
“According to him, it would be most important to specify the war
aims of Russia. Though the brigadier-general is fully aware this
is a question to be settled by the Government, yet he thinks his
opinion might be of some weight.
“In the course of our conversation, we have come to the following
conclusions:
“Whatever may have been our prospects at the time when Turkey
entered into the war, of securing compensations at the cost of
the latter country when peace is concluded, we must own that our
expectations will not be fulfilled during the present war. The
longer the war lasts, the more difficult it will be for us to
secure the possession of the Straits. General Alexiev and General
Danilov agree on this point. I refer you to my letters of December,
1914, and January, 1915, as to Danilov’s opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account