Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
“The defeat of the chief enemy and the restoration of the parts
of the Empire we have lost should be our chief war aim. Our most
important enemy is Germany, for there cannot be any question that
at the present time it is more important for us to recover the
Baltic Provinces than take possession of the Straits. We must
by all means defeat Germany. It is a difficult task, which will
require great efforts and sacrifices. The temporary abandonment of
some of our hopes should be one of these sacrifices.
“Considering the advantages a separate peace with Turkey would
bring us, we might offer it to her without injuring our real
‘interests’—the occupation of the Straits being merely postponed—on
the basis of the _status quo ante bellum_, including the
restoration of the Capitulations and the other rights acquired by
the treaties. We should also demand the dismissal of the Germans,
with a promise on our side to defend Turkey in case of German
reprisals. If a separate peace could be concluded with Turkey on
such a basis, all our Caucasian army would be available. We could
send it to Bessarabia and thus—who knows?—bring Rumania to our
side, or, if Turkey asks for it, send it to defend Constantinople.
England would heave a sigh of relief when the dangers of the
Egyptian campaign and of the Muslim movement thus vanished. She
would then be able to send her Egyptian army—nine divisions—to
Salonika and Kavala, bar the way definitely to the Bulgarians and
liberate Serbia with the help of the French, the Italians, and the
reconstituted Serbian Army. If Turkey were no longer our enemy,
the situation in the Balkans would be quite altered, and we should
be able to keep in touch with our Allies by clearing the southern
route of Europe. In short, the advantages of a separate peace with
Turkey are innumerable. The chief result would be the defeat of
Germany, the only common war aim of all the Allies. No doubt, we
all—they as well as we—will have to waive some of our cherished
schemes. But we are not bound to give them up for ever. If we carry
on the war with Turkey, we delude ourselves with the hope our ideal
can be fulfilled. If we interrupt the war with that country, we
postpone for a time the fulfilment of our wishes. But in return
for this, we shall defeat Germany, the only thing which can secure
a lasting peace for all the Allies and a political, military, and
moral superiority for Russia. If a victory over Germany gives us
back the paramount situation we enjoyed after the Napoleonic wars,
why could not the glorious period of the treaties of Adrianople and
Hunkiar-i-Skelessi occur again? In concluding that treaty we should
have only to take care not to offend the Western Powers, and yet
meet the requirements of Russia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account