Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
“The moment this claim is put forward we are told that the West
has outgrown this stage of human development, and that people who
relieved the Head of a Christian Church of all temporal power are
not prepared to maintain the temporal power of the Head of the
Muslim Church. This idea is urged by the supporters of the Laic
Law of France with all the fanaticism of the days of the Spanish
Inquisition, and in England, too. Some of the most unprejudiced
people wonder at the folly and temerity of those who come to press
such an anachronistic claim. Others suggest that the Khalifa
should be ‘vaticanised’ even if he is to retain Constantinople,
while the Government of India, who should certainly have known
better, say that they cannot acquiesce in Muslim statements which
imply temporal allegiance to the Khilafat on the part of Indian
Muslims, or suggest that temporal power is of the essence of the
Khilafat. Where such criticisms and suggestions go astray is
in misunderstanding the very nature and ideal of Islam and the
Khilafat, and in relying on analogies from faiths which, whatever
their original ideals, have, for all practical purposes, ceased to
interpret life as Islam seeks to do.”
As he had said in the course of his official interview with the British
Premier, as Islam is not “a set of doctrines and dogmas, but a way of
life, a moral code, and a social polity,”—
“Muslims regard themselves as created to serve the one Divine
purpose that runs through the ages, owing allegiance to God in
the first place and acknowledging His authority alone in the last
resort. Their religion is not for Sabbaths and Sundays only, or
a matter for churches and temples. It is a workaday faith, and
meant even more for the market-place than the mosque. Theirs is
a federation of faith, a cosmopolitan brotherhood, of which the
personal centre is the Khalifa. He is not a Pope and is not even a
priest, and he certainly has no pretensions to infallibility. He
is the head of Islam’s Republic, and it is a mere accident, and an
unfortunate accident at that, that he happens to be a king. He is
the Commander of the Faithful, the President of their Theocratic
Commonwealth, and the Leader of all Mussulmans in all matters for
which the Koran and the Traditions of the Prophet, whose successor
he is, provide guidance.”
Therefore, according to the Moslem doctrine—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account