The Two Tests: The Supernatural Claims of Christianity Tried by Two of Its Own Rules — John Shaqi
The Two Tests: The Supernatural Claims of Christianity Tried by Two of Its Own RulesLisle, Lionel
Religion
The Two Tests: The Supernatural Claims of Christianity Tried by Two of Its Own Rules
Lisle, Lionel
Apologetics
c. The visit of the wise men of the East.
d. The appearance of the angel and the heavenly host to the shepherds on
the plains of Bethlehem.
FIRST TEST.--"In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be
established."
Mark and John pass by the birth and upbringing of Jesus in silence.
John, who knew Mary, and to whose care Mary was consigned by the
expiring Jesus, would have been the most competent of all to record _her
version_ of the wondrous experiences of her cousin, herself, and her
husband, in connection with the births of John the Baptist and of Jesus,
yet he has not one word concerning them. Matthew, who may have known
Mary and Joseph, has only meagre statements, very unlike what would be
derived directly from either of the parents. But there is nothing to
show from whom Matthew obtained his information. The detailed narration
of the angelic appearances is made by Luke, who, so far as is known, was
never at Jerusalem at all, far less ever came into contact with Mary.
What, then, have we here?
_John_, the companion and best loved disciple of Jesus, the custodian
of Mary, the most competent of all to narrate occurrences within her
knowledge,--Silent.
_Mark_, the son of a woman known to Peter and the other companions of
Jesus, and himself a companion of Peter, who would have been aware of
these occurrences, if they had been believed among the very earliest
Christian circle,--Silent.
_Matthew_, the companion of Jesus, who may have known Mary and
Joseph,--Records three angel-visits to Joseph in dreams, and the visit
of the wise men of the East, but is silent as to-all the marvels of
Luke.--Is silent as to Matthew's marvels, but sets forth, in detail,
angel-visits to Zacharias and Mary, and the appearance to the shepherds
at Bethlehem.
Luke, who narrates the testimony of others, and does not name his
informants, merely stating that they were eyewitnesses and ministers of
the word, and who writes at least fifty years after the events referred
to.
In the mouth of two, or in the mouth of three witnesses, nay, even in
the mouth of one witness, is any one of these incidents established?
'But let them be examined separately in detail:---
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account