The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.] — John Shaqi
The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
History
The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]
Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
American loyalists; United Empire loyalists
But if these judicial murders were few and far between, in other respects
the revolutionists showed the Tories little mercy. Both those who
remained in the country and those who fled from it were subjected to an
attack on their personal fortunes which gradually impoverished them.
This was carried on at first by a nibbling system of fines and special
taxation. Loyalists were fined for evading military service, for the hire
of substitutes, for any manifestation of loyalty. They were subjected
to double and treble taxes; and in New York and South Carolina they
had to make good all robberies committed in their counties. Then the
revolutionary leaders turned to the expedient of confiscation. From the
very first some of the patriots, without doubt, had an eye on Loyalist
property; and when the coffers of the Continental Congress had been
emptied, the idea gained ground that the Revolution might be financed
by the confiscation of Loyalist estates. Late in 1777 the plan was
embodied in a resolution of the Continental Congress, and the states were
recommended to invest the proceeds in continental loan certificates. The
idea proved very popular; and in spite of a great deal of corruption
in connection with the sale and transfer of the land, large sums found
their way as a result into the state exchequers. In New York alone over
£3,600,000 worth of property was acquired by the state.
The Tory who refused to take the oath of allegiance became in fact
an outlaw. He did not have in the courts of law even the rights of a
foreigner. If his neighbours owed him money, he had no legal redress.
He might be assaulted, insulted, blackmailed, or slandered, yet the law
granted him no remedy. No relative or friend could leave an orphan child
to his guardianship. He could be the executor or administrator of no
man’s estate. He could neither buy land nor transfer it to another. If he
was a lawyer, he was denied the right to practise his profession.
This strict legal view of the status of the Loyalist may not have been
always and everywhere enforced. There were Loyalists, such as the Rev.
Mather Byles of Boston, who refused to be molested, and who survived the
Revolution unharmed. But when all allowance is made for these exceptions,
it is not difficult to understand how the great majority of avowed Tories
came to take refuge within the British lines, to enlist under the
British flag, and, when the Revolution had proved successful, to leave
their homes for ever and begin life anew amid other surroundings. The
persecution to which they were subjected left them no alternative.
CHAPTER IV
THE LOYALISTS UNDER ARMS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account