The Universal KinshipMoore, J. Howard (John Howard)
Philosophy
The Universal Kinship
Moore, J. Howard (John Howard)
Evolution; Human beings; Sociology
structure among the members of a group consist in different
modifications of a fundamental type. Among the vertebrates the
fore-limb may be an arm, a leg, a wing, a shovel, a flipper, or a
fin. But in all cases it is the same organ—that is, the same
implement modified to serve different ends. Take the mouth-parts of
insects. In the grasshopper and cricket these parts are fitted for
grinding; in the moths and butterflies they are fashioned into long
tubes for sucking the sweets of flowers; in the mosquito they form
an elaborate apparatus for drilling and drinking; and in the mayfly
the mouth-parts, though present, are not used at all. In all of
these animals these parts are essentially the same, although
differing so much in their forms and purposes that the unscientific
can scarcely be made to believe they are fundamentally alike. There
is no fact more familiar to the biologist or more frequently met
with in the fields of animal morphology than the fact that the same
general type may be hammered into dozens, or hundreds, or even
thousands, of different patterns by the incessant industry of its
surroundings, and that the same organic part may be moulded into
various implements serving totally different ends by the
environmental vicissitudes of time and space. On the hypothesis that
the members of each group of animals possessing common
characteristics, whether the group be large or small, have sprung
from a common ancestry, and that the differences in structure have
arisen as a result of differences in environment, the similarities
and homologies of structure existing among animals are perfectly
intelligible. But on any other supposition they are inexplicable.
3. Evolution is suggested by the remarkable series of phenomena
presented by embryology. There are at least four facts in the
developmental history of every creature which can hardly be
accounted for on any other supposition than that of organic
evolution.
_First_, the fact that every animal, above the lowest, individually
passes through an evolution between the beginning of its existence
and its maturity. Terrestrial beings are not born, like Minerva,
full-grown. They grow. They evolve. They commence close down to the
very atoms. And from this lowly genesis they rise, through a series
of marvellous changes, to that high state of perfection and
greatness from which they descend to dissolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account