The Universal KinshipMoore, J. Howard (John Howard)
Philosophy
The Universal Kinship
Moore, J. Howard (John Howard)
Evolution; Human beings; Sociology
If we knew by actual observation as little concerning the evolution
of individuals as we do of the evolution of species—if we had
always been used to seeing animals, including ourselves, in full
bloom—had never watched the tadpole, the pupa, and the babe pass
through their wonderful metamorphoses on their way to maturity, it
would probably be just as hard for many minds to believe that
animals evolve individually to be what they are as it is for them to
believe that species have grown to be what they are. In the case of
individuals, however, the evolution takes place right before our
eyes largely, while the evolution of species goes on so slowly and
stretches back so far into the past that it can only be inferred.
_Second_, the fact that animals, no matter how much they may differ
from each other at maturity, all begin existence at the same place.
Every animal commences its organic existence as an egg—as a
one-celled animal—as an organism identical in structure with the
simplest protozoan. The ova of whales ‘are no larger than fern
seeds.’ The eggs of the coral, the crab, the ape, and the man are
so precisely alike that the highest powers of the microscope cannot
distinguish between them.
_Third_, the fact that the members of the same great group of
animals in their individual development pass through similar stages
of evolution. The ‘worm’ stage in the development of most
insects and the ‘fish’ stage of frogs are well known.
There are no more remarkable instances of individual evolution in
the whole range of animal life. The fish, the reptile, the bird, the
dog, and the human being—all vertebrates, in short—cannot for
some time after their embryonic commencement be distinguished from
each other. ‘The feet of lizards and mammals, the wings and feet
of birds, and the hands and feet of men,’ says the illustrious Von
Baer, as quoted by Darwin, ‘all arise from the same fundamental
form’.[1]
‘It is quite in the later stages of development,’ says Huxley,
‘that the human being presents marked differences from the ape,
while the latter departs as much from the dog in its development as
the man does’.[2]
Not only frogs, but reptiles, birds, and mammals, including man, all
have gills at a certain stage in their embryonic development. Nearly
all the lower invertebrate animals are hermaphroditic—that is, in
the body of each animal is found the two kinds of sex organs which
in the higher animals exist in distinct animals. And frogs, birds,
and other higher animals, which as adults are unisexual, have, as an
inheritance from these primitive forms, hermaphroditic embryos.[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account