Bohemianism; English literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
There is a certain passage in his Autobiography which affords a key to
this characteristic of his work.
When quite a boy he had constituted himself imaginary king of an
imaginary kingdom of Gombrom. Speaking of this fancy he writes: “O
reader! do not laugh! I lived for ever under the terror of two separate
wars and two separate worlds; one against the factory boys in a real
world of flesh and blood, of stones and brickbats, of flight and pursuit,
that were anything but figurative; the other in a world purely aerial,
where all the combats and the sufferings were absolute moonshine. And
yet the simple truth is that for anxiety and distress of mind the reality
(which almost every morning’s light brought round) was as nothing in
comparison of that Dream Kingdom which rose like a vapour from my own
brain, and which apparently by the fiat of my will could be for ever
dissolved. Ah, but no! I had contracted obligations to Gombrom; I had
submitted my conscience to a yoke; and in secret truth my will had no
autocratic power. Long contemplation of a shadow, earnest study for the
welfare of that shadow, sympathy with the wounded sensibilities of that
shadow under accumulated wrongs; these bitter experiences, nursed by
brooding thought, had gradually frozen that shadow into a region of
reality far denser than the material realities of brass or granite.”
This confession is a remarkable testimony to the reality of De Quincey’s
imaginative life. “I had contracted obligations to Gombrom.” Yes,
despite his practical experiences with the world, it was Gombrom, “the
moonlight” side of things, that appealed to him. The boys might fling
stones and brickbats, just as the world did later—but though he felt the
onslaught, it moved him far less than did the phantasies of his
imagination.
There is no necessity to weigh Wilde’s experiences of “Our Ladies of
Sorrow” beside those of De Quincey. All we need ask is which impresses
us the more keenly with the actuality of sorrow. And I think there can
be no doubt that it is not De Quincey.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account