The Vailan or annular theory: A synopsis of Prof. I. N. Vail's argument in support of the claim that this Earth once possessed a Saturn-like system of ringsBowers, Stephen
Science
The Vailan or annular theory: A synopsis of Prof. I. N. Vail's argument in support of the claim that this Earth once possessed a Saturn-like system of rings
Bowers, Stephen
Bible and geology; Earth (Planet) -- Crust
Why no fossil plants in the earlier coal deposits? Because no plants
grew at that time. Then we must look for its origin elsewhere than in
plants. If coal be a vegetable product, so is graphite. To say that
animal organism aided in the process simply adds to the difficulty,
since it is carbon that makes the organism and not the organism the
carbon. But suppose fossil plants were found in graphite, would it be
any more evidence that they formed it than that they formed clay or
sandrock in which they are found? The simple fact that organic fossils
are found in carbon beds changed to carbon affords no evidence that
these organisms made the beds.
We find vegetable remains in coal seams just as we find them in any
other rock. A coal plant as a lepidodendron, may begin in the lower
clay, and pierce through a coal seam into the overhanging shale
and sandstone. In the first it is a clay fossil, in the second a
carbonaceous fossil, and in the third a silicious fossil. The fact is
the trunk of a tree in an upright position in a coal bed, which is
quite common, proves that the coal formed around it rapidly. It would
require forty feet of vegetable debris to make five feet of carbon.
Some coal seams are 300 feet thick, which would require at least 2,400
feet of vegetable growth in its formation, which is an impossibility.
As a vegetable product coal would form very slowly, but from the
Vailan system would require but a few hours, or days at most, to lay it
down.
Plants found in coal burn with difficulty, which ought not to be
true if they contained a resinous sap, or bituminous matter. In many
instances you can find a dozen fossil plants in the overlying clay to
where you can find one in coal. They are clay fossils because they are
imbedded in clay, same as fossils in coal are carbon because imbedded
in carbon.
If coal is compressed peat, as some would have us believe, why do we
not find fibres running vertically through it? You may examine peat
after a pressure of twenty tons to the square inch has been exerted,
and yet the vertical structure of the mass will be apparent. Since we
find abundance of rootlets running in all directions, vertically as
well as horizontally in the under clays of coal beds it is evident that
coal is not a metamorphosed peat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account