The Victories of Wellington and the British ArmiesMaxwell, W. H. (William Hamilton)
History
The Victories of Wellington and the British Armies
Maxwell, W. H. (William Hamilton)
Great Britain -- History, Military -- 19th century; Wellington, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of, 1769-1852
Never was more heroism displayed than by the British regiments engaged
in the murderous conflict of Albuera. The soldiers dropped by whole
ranks, but never thought of turning. When a too ardent wish to succour
those pressed upon the hill, induced Stewart to hurry Colborne’s
brigade into action, without allowing it a momentary pause to halt and
form,--and in the mist, that unluckily favoured the lancer charge, the
companies were unexpectedly assailed,--though fighting at dreadful
disadvantage, the men resisted to the last. Numbers perished by the
lance-blade; but still the dead Poles, that were found intermingled
with the fallen English, shewed that the gallant islanders had not died
without exacting blood for blood.
The French exceeded the British by at least a thousand. Of their worst
wounded, eight hundred were left upon the field. Their loss in superior
officers, like that of the British, had been most severe--two generals
having been killed, and three severely wounded.
To a victory both sides laid claim--the French resting theirs on the
capture of some colours, the taking of a howitzer, with some five
hundred prisoners whom they had secured unwounded. But the British kept
the battle-ground; and though neither cannon nor eagle remained with
them, a field covered with carcases, and heaped with bleeding enemies,
was the best trophy of their valour, and clearly established to whom
conquest in reality belonged.
Much military controversy has arisen from the fight of Albuera--
and Marshal Beresford has received some praise and more censure.
Probably the battle should not have been fought at all; or, if it
were unavoidable, greater care might have been bestowed in taking
the position--and, certainly, the investment of Badajoz should not
have been continued so long. Much, however, can be urged in favour of
Marshal Beresford--for his was a most embarrassing command, and he had
numerous and unexpected difficulties to contend with. Opposed to him
was one of the ablest of Napoleon’s generals, and an army formed of the
finest _matériel_, complete in every arm, and under the orders of the
best officers of France. How differently was his force constructed:--
a small portion of the whole were British: on another part of it, the
Portuguese, some fair reliance might be placed; but the half of his
army were an ill-commanded and ill-disciplined force, half-starved,
half-armed, worn down by fatigue, and beaten repeatedly by the very
troops they were again obliged to encounter. Little dependence could
be placed on such worthless levies--and still less on their stubborn
commander. When the real attack of the French marshal was apparent
to everybody, Blake, with proverbial obstinacy, refused to alter his
formation until his clumsy battalions had not sufficient time to change
their front, and the French columns were actually mounting the hill to
attack him. This was bad enough, yet, after all, it was but an error
of the head. But the man was radically worthless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account