The Viking Age. Volume 1 (of 2): The early history, manners, and customs of the ancestors of the English-speaking nationsDu Chaillu, Paul B. (Paul Belloni)
History
The Viking Age. Volume 1 (of 2): The early history, manners, and customs of the ancestors of the English-speaking nations
Thus we see that, though hardly more than three hundred years had
elapsed since the time when, according to the Roman writers, the fleets
of the Franks and Saxons swarmed over every sea of Europe, not a vestige
of their former maritime power remained in the time of Charlemagne, and
the Saxons were still occupying the same country as in the days of
Ptolemy.
Pondering over the above important facts, the question arises: Were not
the Romans mistaken in giving the names of Saxons and Franks to the
maritime tribes of whose origin, country, and homes they knew nothing,
but who came to attack their shores? Were not these so-called Saxons and
Franks in reality tribes of Sueones, Swedes, Danes, Norwegians? The
Romans knew none of the countries of these people. It seems strange, if
not incredible, to find two peoples, whose country had a vast sea-coast
and deep rivers, totally abandoning the seafaring habits possessed by
their forefathers.
It cannot be doubted that Ivar Vidfadmi, after him Harald Hilditönn,
then Sigurd Hring and Ragnar Lodbrok and his sons, and probably some of
the Danish and Swedish kings before them, made expeditions to England,
and gained and held possessions there. Several distinct records, having
no connection with each other, being parts of different Sagas and
histories, with the archæology, form the evidence.
“Ivar Vidfadmi (wide-fathomer) subdued the whole of Sviaveldi (the
Swedish realm); he also got Danaveldi (Danish realm) and a large part of
Saxland, and the whole of Austrriki (Eastern realm, including Russia,
&c.) and the fifth part of England. From his kin have come the kings of
Denmark and the kings of Sweden who have had sole power in these lands”
(Ynglinga Saga, c. 45).
The above is corroborated by another quite independent source.
“Ivar Vidfadmi ruled England till his death-day. As he lay on his
death-bed he said he wanted to be carried to where the land was exposed
to attacks, and that he hoped those who landed there would not be
victorious. When he died it happened as he said, and he was
_mound-laid_. It is said by many men that when King Harald Sigurdsson
came to England he landed where Ivar’s mound was, and he was slain
there. When Vilhjálm Bastard came to the land he broke open the mound of
Ivar and saw that the corpse was not rotten; he made a large pyre, and
had Ivar burned on it; then he went up on land and got the victory”
(Ragnar Lodbrók’s Saga, c. 19).
We find that not only did the Norwegians call themselves Northmen, but
that both Danes and Sueones were called Northmen in the Frankish
Chronicles.[18]
“The Danes and Sueones, whom we call Northmen, occupy both the northern
shore and all its islands.”
So also Nigellus (in the reign of Louis Le Debonnaire).[19]
“The Danes also after the manner of the Franks are called by the name of
Manni.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account