The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
First of all, we see that the cash in hand and at the Bank of England
is nearly £6,000,000. This is legal tender, that which the law of the
land has enacted shall be absolute, permanent wealth, not subject to
the vagaries of fashion or sentiment.
Money at call and short notice is nearly as much--over five and a
half millions. This forms a portion of the loan deposits, and being
callable by the banks practically on demand, they show that a portion
of the deposits payable on demand can also be recalled on demand. The
equivalent of these loans, or deposits, the bank possesses in the
shape of wealth not in the absolute category of legal tender. They are
securities of the highest class, securities representing the credit or
wealth of the nation. While these securities are lying in the safes of
the banks they have been converted into temporary currency, and have
been fulfilling all the purposes of money in circulation. They have
been resurrected from dead into live capital. A similar process could
be gone through by selling the securities in the market. The owner
could convert them for his purposes into liquid capital. But he sells
them temporarily to the bank instead of permanently in the market,
and when he has employed his liquid capital temporarily, he repays
it to the bank. He rechanges it, as it were, into dead or illiquid
capital, until the moment comes when he desires to reconvert it into
live capital, or currency. The bank possesses the wealth in bonds; he
possesses the wealth in currency, and the bank’s gain consists of the
interest on the accommodation, and his gain in the profit accruing from
the active employment of his capital.
There is no more trust than a butcher has when he sells a leg of
mutton for 4_s._ 6_d._ on the nail. His dead leg of mutton he converts
into live legal tender currency. If he never sold his mutton he would
starve. If the housewife’s husband earned no more salary wherewith to
exchange it for future legs of mutton they would starve.
If the banker lent the borrower money without security, it would be
more truly credit, for he would have no wealth that was the equivalent
of the loan.
If he, at certain seasons, is compelled to call in these loans to
bill-brokers and others and cannot renew them--quite a frequent,
familiar operation--those who want to convert their dead wealth into
currency go to the Bank of England. Machinery similar to that employed
in the joint stock banks is put into operation there. The Bank takes in
the securities, debits itself with the amount it empowers the borrower
to withdraw in currency, and credits itself, not with words, but with
valuable bonds. It insists that these bonds shall be of the highest
value, and this insistence is inconsistent with the idea of what the
ordinary man regards as giving credit. Otherwise, there would be
greater trust in promises than in securities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account