The war drama of the Eagles : $b Napoleon's standard-bearers on the battlefield in victory and defeat from Austerlitz to Waterloo, a record of hard fighting, heroism, and adventureFraser, Edward
History
The war drama of the Eagles : $b Napoleon's standard-bearers on the battlefield in victory and defeat from Austerlitz to Waterloo, a record of hard fighting, heroism, and adventure
Fraser, Edward
France -- History, Military; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Military leadership; Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1815 -- Campaigns
Councillor Laumond proposed the adoption of the Elephant instead; with
for a motto “_Mole et Mente_.” The Elephant had a great vogue at that
day among European heraldic authorities as being pre-eminently a royal
beast. There was a widely prevalent belief, on the authority of old
writers on natural history, that an Elephant could not be made to bow
its knees. Further, too, the elephant typified resistless strength as
well as magnanimity. And had not Caesar himself once placed the effigy
of the Elephant on the Roman coinage? Nobody else at the Council,
however, seemed to care for the Elephant.
Councillor Simon objected to Ségur’s proposition, on the score that the
Lion was essentially an aggressive beast.
Cambacérès, ex-Consul and Arch-Chancellor of the Empire, suggested a
swarm of Bees as the most suitable national emblem. It would represent
the actual situation of France, he explained--a republic with a
presiding chief.
Councillor Lacuèe supported Cambacérès. The Bee, he added, was the
more suitable, in that it possessed a sting as well as being a maker of
honey.
Cambacérès remarked that he favoured the idea of the Bee as typifying
peaceful industry rather than offensive power.
The other members took no interest in the idea of the Bee, and after
some discursive talk the Council fell back on the Committee’s original
suggestion of the historic Gallic Cock. The general voice favoured the
adoption of the Cock, and they unanimously voted for it.
That, however, would not do for Napoleon. He sharply refused once more
to hear of the Cock in any circumstances. He had for some minutes sat
silent, listening to the discussion until the vote was taken. On that
he rose and banned the Cock absolutely and finally.
“The Cock is quite too weak a creature,” he exclaimed. “A thing like
that cannot possibly be the cognisance of an Empire such as France. You
must make your choice between the Eagle, the Elephant, and the Lion!”
The Eagle, however, did not commend itself to the Council. That emblem,
it was pointed out by several members, had been already adopted by
other European nations. For France, such being the case, the Eagle
would not be sufficiently distinctive. The German Empire had the Eagle
for its cognisance. So had Austria. So had Prussia. So had Poland
even--the White Eagle of the Jagellons. The Council was plainly not
attracted by the Eagle.
Lebrun, the other ex-Consul, Arch-Treasurer of the Empire, now put in
a word again for the Fleur-de-Lis. It had been, he said, the national
emblem of France under all the previous dynasties. The Fleur-de-Lis,
declared Lebrun, was the real historic emblem of France, and he
proposed that it should be adopted for the Empire.
Nobody, though, supported him, one member, Councillor Regnaud,
condemning the idea of the Fleur-de-Lis as utterly out of date. “The
nation,” added Regnaud, with a sneer, “will neither go back to the cult
of the Lilies nor to the religion of Rome!”
[Sidenote: “YOU MUST CHOOSE THE LION!”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account