The war myth in United States history — John Shaqi
The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
(7) When the Townshend duties were repealed in 1770 a tax was still
left on tea, in order to assert the right to levy such a tax. In
1773, Great Britain allowed a tea company known as the East India
Company to bring over a large quantity of tea. This company had been
given a monopoly of the colonial tea market. When this tea arrived
in Boston, on December 16, 1773, a group of men entered the ship and
threw overboard the cargo valued at about £15,000. But why was this
tea destroyed? Simply because the leaders in this act were tea
merchants in Boston, whose trade would have to compete with the newly
arrived tea had it been permitted to enter the market. The act was
the destruction of private property on the part of the participants.
The more moderate element in Boston wanted the tea paid for and the
action repudiated.
(8) As a punishment for this performance, Great Britain passed the
five punitive or coercive acts of 1774. These five acts were the
following: Close the port of Boston until the tea should be paid for.
Revise the charter of Massachusetts. Send to England for trial
colonial agents accused of violence in the execution of their duties.
Station soldiers in Massachusetts to aid in the execution of law.
Annex to Quebec the land between the Ohio River and the Great Lakes.
These acts were all legal. Great Britain had as much right to demand
that Boston pay for the tea destroyed as we have to demand that a
foreign power compensate our subjects for property lost there through
the mob action of its subjects.
(9) Another cause of the Revolution often overlooked was the general
economic depression both in Great Britain and the colonies following
the close of the French and Indian War in 1763. This was felt in all
industries. Depressions of this sort always create political unrest
and a desire for change in government, even though the authorities in
power are in no way responsible for the condition. This is
especially true in American political history. Presidential
elections have been determined by economic conditions having no
direct bearing upon the issues involved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account