The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
Instead of thirteen units, as we usually regard the thirteen
colonies, there were three units differing in economic and political
ideals. The coastal plains extending from New Hampshire to
Pennsylvania constituted one, which was dominated by commercial
interests. The second was the tidewater section from Maryland to
Georgia, which was primarily agricultural and was dominated by the
planters. The third unit or section was the frontier with extreme
ideas about political democracy. The first unit was commercial and
interested in trade and shipbuilding. Great mercantile families had
grown up there accumulating their wealth largely through smuggling
with the West Indies. To them the navigation laws were especially
offensive. Their chief desire was to restore the commercial
conditions before 1763, yet they bitterly opposed a withdrawal from
the British Empire, for they wanted its protection. They dominated
Boston, Newport, New York, and Philadelphia. They were Whig in
opposing trade restrictions, but Tory in opposing separation. They
had no sympathy with the political radicalism of Jefferson, Henry,
and such leaders. The second region was the tidewater region of the
South. It was dominated by the planters, many of whom were heavily
in debt to British creditors. They secured the passage of lax
bankruptcy laws detrimental to non-resident creditors. These laws,
however, were vetoed by the king as were the laws providing for
colonial bills of credit. These planters felt themselves
aristocrats. Although they opposed British financial policy, they
likewise objected to the democracy of Jefferson. The third section
was the frontier. This section had often been discriminated against
by the older sections in matters of representation in the colonial
assemblies, administration of justice, and taxation. Its inhabitants
were zealous for popular rights and had no economic interests to the
contrary. In domestic politics they were out of harmony with the
commercial and planter sections. Their zeal for imaginary "rights of
man" gave great impetus to the movement for independence. Henry and
Jefferson were the leaders of this section and their point of view
prevailed when the Declaration of Independence was written, the ideas
of which were shocking to the other sections.
These three sections reacted differently to the various British Acts.
In Georgia, the frontier people were pro-British because they were
dependent upon Great Britain for subsidies and protection from the
Indians. The frontier people of North Carolina were also Tory
because they had a sharp difference with the eastern part of the
state. Had the frontier of all the colonies had a similar sharp
difference with the coastal plains they would no doubt have been Tory
and defeated the Revolution. The frontier of Virginia got possession
of the state and furnished such leaders as Henry and Jefferson.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account