The war myth in United States history — John Shaqi
The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
But in recent years another cause of the war and the chief cause has
been discovered. This was land hunger.
The United States entered the conflict at the insistence of the south
and west, despite the opposition of the northeastern states. The
inland section overruled the opposition of the maritime section. At
that time, there was an ardent expansionist sentiment along the whole
western and southern border looking towards the annexation of Canada
and Florida, with a vaguer idea of seizing all of the Spanish
possessions of North America. Spain then owned Florida. Spain and
Great Britain were allies against Napoleon, and a war with one was
looked upon as a war with both. The belief that the United States
would some day annex Canada had existed continuously since the
Revolution. Benjamin Franklin had advocated the buying of Canada by
the United States, since we failed to take it during the Revolution.
The Continental Congress made an effort to capture Canada, but our
armies were repulsed. Washington had objected to leaving Canada in
British hands. In 1803 Governor Morris of Pennsylvania wrote that at
the time of the Constitutional Convention he knew "that all North
America must at length be annexed to us--happy indeed if the lust of
dominion stop there." This idea, however, was a vague dream till
about 1810.
There had been friction in the northwest between the Americans and
British. The British retained trading posts in the northwest after
they had agreed to give them up by the treaty of 1783 recognizing the
independence of the United States. These were held to compensate the
Tories for their property confiscated during the Revolutionary War,
which had not been done. For this reason, the British held the
northwest posts until 1796, when they were given up by the Jay
Treaty. All the Indian trouble in that section was attributed to
British propaganda, which incited the Indians against the United
States. The Canadian traders made friends with the Indians to get
their trade while the Americans were aggressively pushing them back
from their land. The result was that the Indian was more friendly to
the British in Canada than to the United States.
The idea of annexing Canada was intensified after 1810 because of the
belief that the Indians were being turned against the United States
by the British. The south was almost unanimous in its demand for the
annexation of Florida, while the southwest was taking a lively
interest in Mexico. This land hunger was making its appearance
rapidly, but it was several years later that the phrase "manifest
destiny" was to come into general use.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account