The war myth in United States history — John Shaqi
The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
The Civil War was the result of a series of political crimes and
blunders of which both sections of the country were equally guilty.
It was not inevitable or necessary to fight in order to abolish
slavery. In every other country of the world slavery had been
abolished without war. The question of slavery had never been a
party issue until after the Mexican War, but from then until the
election of 1860 slavery was the leading political issue. During the
war with Mexico, Wilmot, of Pennsylvania, offered what is known as
the Wilmot Proviso, which provided that the territory acquired from
Mexico should be closed to slavery. Although this bill was defeated
in Congress it brought up the question of the further extension of
slavery.
At the time of the Mexican War there were two national parties--the
Whigs and the Democrats. These two parties embraced almost all of
the people, and as both were strong in both sections of the United
States, they tended to cement the union, for parties on a national
basis tend to unify a nation while sectional parties lead to
disunion. The anti-slavery people and the moderates gravitated
towards the Whig party while the pro-slavery people gravitated
towards the Democratic party.
The Whigs elected General Zachary Taylor President in 1848. Although
he was a large slave holder of Louisiana, he was a moderate, and was
satisfactory to all groups and sections. He had the support of
Lincoln as well as of the southern Whigs. Soon after Taylor became
President, Henry Clay proposed the famous Compromise of 1850, the
important features of which were: admit California as a free state,
organize the remainder of the territory taken from Mexico without
regard to slavery, abolish the slave trade in the District of
Columbia, and pass a fugitive slave law to be enforced by the federal
government. This compromise, although a Whig measure, was
instrumental in killing the Whig party. No party or section was
satisfied with it. President Taylor opposed it but his death before
its passage brought to the presidency the Vice-President, Fillmore,
who allowed it to become a law without his signature. The provision
that broke up the Whig party was the strict fugitive slave law, and
anti-slavery Whigs repudiated their party. The idea of returning
fugitive slaves was shocking to the best moral judgment of the time.
The leaders of moral sentiment--ministers, poets, and reformers of
every type--advised disobedience. It was a dead letter because the
moral sentiment of the age was against it. On the other hand, the
pro-slavery people did not like it because it was not enforced. Thus
the law was treated with contempt by both parties.
The Whig party which was moderate, national, opposed to expansion,
and the extension of slavery was disrupted. The Democrats carried
all except four states in 1852, and remained in power until 1860,
dominated by powerful pro-slavery sentiment throughout this period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account