The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
After the fall of the Whig party the Republican party was organized
in 1856. It took the name "Republican" from the followers of Thomas
Jefferson and claimed it was a revival of the party of Jefferson. It
was the liberal party, opposed to slavery. It was organized and
until after the Civil War dominated by the liberal element in the
United States. The Democratic party also claimed themselves to be
followers of Jefferson, which they were not, at that time, except in
a very narrow legal sense. Jefferson was opposed to slavery and
special privilege in every form. In 1800 he advocated state rights
or a decentralized government because he believed the states were and
would always be more popularly controlled than the federal
government. But by 1860 that situation was reversed. The
states--especially the southern states--had begun to be dominated by
the privileged group, who talked in terms of state rights to
perpetuate this privilege, while Jefferson talked in terms of state
rights because he feared the domination of the federal government by
the reactionary element. Both Lincoln and Jefferson held the same
views socially. The Democratic party of the pre-Civil War period had
repudiated Jefferson. But the Republican party did not become
reactionary until after the Civil War.
When the Republican party was organized in 1856, it was regarded as
"red," chiefly in the eyes of the south, for it was organized
principally with the idea of keeping slavery out of the west. Its
campaign literature in 1856 was composed largely of the anti-slavery
utterances of Jefferson. To the south "Republican," "anarchy,"
"abolitionist," "Lincoln," "John Brown," and "Garrison" were soon to
become synonymous terms. Because of this the Republican party had no
following in the south even among a great many people who wished to
abolish slavery. It became a sectional party, which was its fatal
weakness in dealing with slavery, as compared with the former Whig
party, which had had a national following. The Republican party was
sectional before 1860.
Lincoln had been a Whig, and had accepted the Compromise of 1850.
Although he was one of the great men of all times, he was a victim of
many of the common errors of his age. Reflecting the belief of his
time, he considered slavery a stable institution. His great
democratic spirit lay in the fact that he expressed the ideas of the
common man, and had complete faith in him. He tried to recognize and
give expression to the purposes and aspirations of the masses, which
made him one of the world's greatest democrats, with democracy's
strengths and weaknesses. Lincoln was not a creative thinker and had
few pretensions in that direction. He had no intention of abolishing
slavery in the states--he simply wished to prevent it from spreading.
He also held the common attitude of his age that the Negro belonged
to an inferior race.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account