The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
But the undisguised hostility of Spain to the Edict of Amboise was
a greater source of danger to France than protests of the Parlement
or popular violence. “If the heretics obtain their demands with the
aid of the English queen,” Chantonnay had threatened on March 6, “the
Catholics in their turn will rise, and they will be sustained by the
King my master and by all the Catholic princes.”[696] But Catherine was
in no mood to be intimidated. She openly told him that he treated her
as if he governed the country, and charged him with wilful fabrication,
sarcastically adding that she could excuse him for so doing in some
degree because she knew from whom he derived his opinions, meaning the
constable and the two deceased members of the Triumvirate.[697] Philip
II’s religious convictions were outraged by the toleration of Calvinism
allowed in the Edict of Amboise, the more so because the queen mother,
in justification of the course of the government, compromised the
church at large by declaring that the sole practical solution of
the difficulty could be accomplished by a true general council of
the church, and _not_ by the one sitting at Trent, in defiance of
whose conclusions she asserted the legality and inviolability of the
edict.[698]
Catherine de Medici was deeply concerned over the conduct of the
Council of Trent. For the programme of zealous advocates of the
counter-Reformation there aimed at church consolidation and the
enlargement of papal authority to such an extent that the immemorial
liberties of the Gallican church, confirmed by the great concordat of
1516, and the rights of the crown over the temporalities of the church
in France were seriously threatened. The complication of the Huguenots
with England and the murder of the duke of Guise had brought this issue
to a head. In the month in which the duke was assassinated there was
a significant meeting of the ambassadors of the ultra-Catholic powers
resident at the French court, in which it was resolved to support
the Council in matters of religion; to prevent future appropriation
of church revenues by the state under pain of excommunication; to
stamp out heresy; and to avenge the murder of the duke of Guise.[699]
The cardinal of Lorraine was the chief representative of France at
Trent and perhaps the most conspicuous prelate there. He was bitter
against the policy of Charles IX, advocating utter suppression of the
Huguenots. His continuance at Trent, therefore, became a danger to
France and Catherine de Medici dexterously found means to remove him by
sending him on special errands to Vienna and Venice, leaving the case
of France at Trent in the hands of the sieur de Lansac, whose loyalty
to the Catholic faith did not subvert his patriotism.[700]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account