The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
He broached it to the queen, and with
her consent communicated it to the duke. This remedy, at the twelfth
hour, was very opportune. It is this: This assembly shall be held:
but under certain conditions. The first is that the persons chosen to
participate in it shall be of such influence as to be able to demand
that no Huguenot shall sit in it; secondly, the assembly must conform
to that which the queen had at first proposed; that is to say, all
disputes over dogma and doctrine shall be forbidden. The queen, having
accepted this, authorized the nuncio to communicate her consent to the
duke, who showed himself satisfied. Both of them then came together
to find the queen again, and on the next day, in the presence of the
queen of Spain, the cardinal Bourbon, the marshal Bourdillon, and the
leading nobles, the whole was confirmed.
Great benefit can come from this: by eliminating everything that
pertains to dogma, and avoiding doctrinal difficulties, all the
other resolutions which are of less importance will be strengthened,
especially as the Huguenots, the only ones who can give trouble will
be excluded. There is no doubt about both the king and the queen being
disposed to the Catholic religion, since they have given proofs of
it. I am, moreover, assured by what the queen has said, that there
is no intention to touch any of the privileges of the Holy See, nor,
per contra, any of the concessions made by the popes to the kings who
were predecessors of the king now reigning. The execution of this
convention thus arranged is not to take place until the return of the
king to Paris.
The King of Spain, in the letter cited to Cardinal Pacheco, expressed
his contentment with this agreement,[980] not perceiving that the
application of it was capable of a great amount of flexibility. In his
blindness he thought that the nuncio had broken the loaf so as to give
the greater portion to Spain; while in reality the greater part was in
the hands of the Pope, Philip II having actually but the difference
between a fragment and no bread. In fine, no plot was entered into
at Bayonne; no crime was ever committed in pursuance of an agreement
arranged there. The “plot” agreed upon at Bayonne between Catherine
de Medici and Philip II of Spain consisted of an ambiguous promise,
the fulfilment of which was dependent upon an impossible condition of
things.[981]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account