The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
At Paris, fearful of going to the Louvre, the King lodged in the
house of De Retz in the Faubourg St. Honoré and then went to Bois
de Vincennes. Failing in his purpose Guitery sought to cross the
Seine at Mantes, probably with the intention of joining La Noue who,
having taken Lusignan and other towns in Poitou, as unsuccessfully
was endeavoring to cross the Loire to join Guitery.[1634] When the
first alarm was over, the King and queen mother tried to make light
of the episode. But it was a symptom the lesson of which could not be
mistaken. It is plain that Charles IX and his mother feared greatly
what Alençon might be planning, but he affirmed vigorously that he was
only trying to escape from court.[1635] When questioned, he disclaimed
any treasonable intent or purpose to disturb the kingdom, but admitted
his hatred for the court party and his sympathy for the Politiques. In
a long harangue the duke accused the King of undue favoritism of his
brother, the duke of Anjou. The ground of his reproaches seems to have
been pique because of the fact that, while in camp before La Rochelle,
affairs of importance were never discussed in his presence.
After the departure of the king of Poland, when he hoped to have more
insight into public affairs, he had not been admitted, nor was he able
to obtain the dignity and functions which had belonged to his brother.
And these facts had lowered his reputation in the court to such an
extent that the Guises not only desired to quarrel with him but were
continually laboring to effect that result.[1636]
Further, Alençon complained
that the king and his mother threw difficulties in the way of his
intentions in Flanders; and made use of such well-reasoned arguments
that it was clear the case that he put forward had been prepared by
persons possessing greater experience and knowledge than his capacity
could pretend to have. But he did not reveal any names. He alleged
that he would have to remain a poor prince unless by force of arms
he could acquire a position whereby he might obtain a sufficient
reputation to accomplish a marriage with the queen of England; that in
France the authorities and powers enjoyed by his brother, the King of
Poland, were not given him, and that what little power he had was only
in name, while, on the other hand, the prince of Orange has sought his
aid by very large offers and many great promises had also been made to
him from Germany and England, and that in the kingdom of France many
persons had pledged their word to follow his fortunes everywhere.[1637]
The Guisard faction and Biragues, the chancellor, in order to strike
Montmorency, who with Damville was the leader of the Politiques, urged
a drastic course. At the meeting of the King’s council, the chancellor
said to the King:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account