The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
It was manifest by the spring of 1575 that the prince of Condé and
Henry of Navarre on the one hand, and Damville and his brother,
together with Alençon, were bound to join hands in the common purpose
to establish permanent religious and greater civil liberty in France.
“Liberty and reform” was the policy of the hour, if not the watchword.
The declaration of the assembly of Milhau in August of the previous
year had been the handwriting on the wall—a message which the
misguided Henry III obdurately refused to read. On April 25, 1575, that
message was repeated in even clearer terms in the form of a manifesto
issued by Damville which defined the joint policy of the Politiques and
the political Huguenots. It was the declaration of a patriot, and not
a partisan, least of all a rebel, who, like Cromwell, found himself
compelled to lead a movement for political reform against an obstinate
crown that either would not or could not understand the issues.[1693]
Reading between the lines of the constitution agreed upon at Nîmes,
the republican nature of the government therein provided for is
noticeable.[1694] The right to exercise the sovereign rights of
legislation, of justice, of taxation, of making war and peace, of
regulating commerce no longer were vested in the King where the Act of
Union prevailed, but in a representative body. Languedoc, Provence, and
Dauphiné were _de facto_ independent of the crown.[1695] Supplementary
articles of Condé and Damville, and of the Catholics and Protestants of
Languedoc, Provence, and Dauphiné demanded (1) that freedom of exercise
of religion without distinction be permitted; (2) that the parlements
should be composed half of Catholics, and half of Protestants, the
latter to be nominated by the prince of Condé; (3) that justice be
done upon the authors of the massacre of St. Bartholomew and the
forfeit and attainder of the admiral be reversed; (4) that the places
at present held by the Huguenots be retained besides Boulogne and La
Charité, and that for additional defense the King should give them in
each province two out of three towns to be named to him by the prince
of Condé; (5) that the King pay 200,000 crowns for expenses of the
war; (6) that neither the marshal de Retz, nor the chancellor Biragues
should have any part in the negotiations for peace; (7) that the duke
of Montmorency and the marshal Cossé should be set at liberty, and
their innocence declared in full Parlement “en robe rouge;” (8) that
the heirs of those who have been murdered should have their estates
returned to them; (9) that the queen of England, the elector palatine,
and the dukes of Savoy and Deuxponts should be parties to the peace;
(10) that within three months after peace the States-General be
assembled to establish good order in France.[1696]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account