The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
chancellor L’Hôpital, although Coligny is not without credit for his
influence.[154]
These changes had the double effect, first, of persuading the queen
to take the management of affairs upon herself and endeavor to remove
the house of Guise from court; and second, in giving the Huguenots
and their partisans the opportunity of strengthening themselves. The
leniency of the government drew back into France numbers of those who
had withdrawn, among them preachers from Geneva and England who gave
new life to the party by exhorting them to continue their assemblies
and the exercise of their religion.[155] There was fear that the
“interim” would be used by the Huguenots like the edge of a wedge to
open the way to possess churches of their own, and such a demand was
shortly to be made openly in the King’s council at Fontainebleau in
August, 1560.
It was apparent that there was not a province which was not affected,
and there were many in which the new religion was even spreading into
the country, as in Normandy, Brittany, almost all Touraine, Poitou,
Guyenne, Gascony, the great part of Languedoc, Dauphiné, Provence, and
Champagne.[156] The “religion of Geneva” extended to all classes, even
to the clergy—priests, monks, nuns, whole convents almost, bishops,
and many of the chief prelates. The movement seemed to be widest
among the common people, who had little to lose, now that life seemed
safe. Those who feared to lose their property were less moved. But
nevertheless all classes of society seemed deeply pervaded. While the
“interim” lasted only those were punished who were actually preaching
and holding public assemblies. The prisons of Paris and other towns
were emptied, and in consequence there was a great number of persons
throughout the kingdom who went around glorying in the victory over the
“papists,” the name which they give their adversaries. To add to the
discomfiture of the Guises, the breach between them and Montmorency was
widened.[157] The duke of Guise had purchased the right of the sieur de
Rambures to the county of Dammartin, not far from Paris, and adjacent
to that of Nanteuil,[158] which the duke had shortly before acquired,
the lower court of which was held in relief of Dammartin. In order to
do so the duke of Guise had persuaded Philippe de Boulainvilliers,
who had lately sold the property to the constable, to rescind the
contract which had been made, and sell it to him.[159] But the duke met
with a straight rebuff, for when he sent word of the transaction, the
constable answered by Damville, his son, that “as he had bought it, so
would he keep it.”[160] The feud between the Guises and Montmorency
naturally threw the “connestablistes” more than ever to the side of
Condé. Damville was sent to the King and the queen mother, who were
staying at Chateaudun, to inform them that the Guises were his declared
adversaries, and then went to confer with the prince of Condé, whom he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account