The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Although the initial purpose of the conspiracy had failed, namely
to take the King and drive out the Guises,[144] Condé and his
followers did not fail to perceive that things were not entirely
unfavorable.[145] Catherine de Medici, who while jealous of the
position of the Guises in a place which naturally, and by tradition,
if the regencies of Blanche of Castille and Anne of Beaujeu counted as
precedents, belonged to her, had nevertheless sustained the drastic
policy followed out after the execution of Du Bourg, in spite of the
arguments of the admiral.[146] Now, however, she saw her opportunity
to make head against the cardinal and his brother and played into the
hands of Coligny and Condé.[147] She prevailed upon the King to send
the admiral upon a special mission to Normandy late in July, where
he was expected to take the edge off the Marshal Termes’ conduct, and
secretly abetted the faction of the constable.[148] The opportunity
was the better to do these things owing to the death of the chancellor
Olivier on March 27,[149] who had been an instrument of the Guises,
and the queen mother was quick to seize it. The famous Michel de
l’Hôpital[150] was immediately appointed to the vacancy. He was a man
of great knowledge in the law and of great culture; at the moment he
was president of the _chambre des comptes_ and had been chancellor to
Madame Marguerite of France, the duchess of Savoy (who had Protestant
leanings, and had interceded for Du Bourg), and was a member of the
_conseil privé_ of the King. L’Hôpital’s accession was followed by the
proclamation of letters of pardon to all recent offenders, provided
they lived as good Catholics, the King declaring that he was unwilling
to have the first year of his reign made notorious to posterity for
its bloody atrocities and the sufferings of his people.[151] This was
followed in May, 1560, by the royal edict of Romorantin, whereby the
jurisdiction of legal processes relating to religion was completely
taken away from the courts of parlement and from lay judges who had
power to pass summary judgments, and was remitted to the ecclesiastical
judges; which was interpreted as an assurance to accused persons
that they needed no longer fear the penalty of death, owing to the
opportunity of delaying sentences by means of appeals from the acts
and sentences of bishops to archbishops and from thence to Rome.[152]
In August a supplementary decree ordered the bishops and all curates
to reside at their churches, the bishops being prohibited in the
future from proceeding against anyone in the matter of religion except
the Calvinist preachers or persons in whose houses Huguenot meetings
were held, the government thus tacitly permitting others to live in
their own way, which was interpreted as a virtual “interim.”[153]
The spirit of this legislation, as well as the skilful use of the
law made therein, is certainly due to the heart and brain of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account