The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Montluc, the bishop of Valence,[201] as the youngest privy-councilor,
began the discussion when the Council reconvened.[202] But the speech
of the occasion was that of Marillac, the liberal archbishop of Vienne,
who, taking his cue from the chancellor, in a long discourse[203]
enlarged upon the religious, political, and economic distress of
France. His address is a complete statement of the Huguenot programme
in church and state. He began by saying that the true “ancient and
customary” remedy was a general council, but failing that, recourse
must be had to a national council, and then proceeded to enumerate
the things to be considered therein; first, the intrusion of foreign
prelates—chiefly Italians—into French ecclesiastical offices,[204]
“who fill a third portion of the benefices of the kingdom, who have an
infinite number of pensions, who suck our blood like leeches, and who
in their hearts, laugh at us for being so stupid as not to see that
we are being abused;” secondly, he demanded that the clergy of France
show by some notable act that they were sincerely bent upon reform
and not merely seeking to fortify their prerogatives and privileges
under the pretension of reform; and to this end the illicit use of
money—“that great Babylonian beast, which is avarice, in whose path
follow so many superstitions and abominations”—must be guarded
against; thirdly, the wicked must make sincere repentance; fourthly,
for the adjustment of the political and economic questions vexing the
people the States-General must be convened. Then followed a statement
of conditions: that the king must live upon the income of the royal
domains, the spoliation of which should cease; that his wars be
supported by the old feudal aids and not by recourse to extraordinary
taxes.
This speech highly pleased the admiral, who added three points,
namely, that, a religious “interim” be officially granted until the
findings of the Council of Trent, which the Pope was to be asked to
reconvene; that in event of refusal to do so, a national council of
the clergy of France be called in which the Huguenots should have
a representation;[205] and that the number of guards around the
court, “which were very expensive and only served to infuse fears and
jealousies into the people’s minds” be reduced.[206]
The upshot of the conference was the resolution to call a meeting of
the States-General for December 10 at Meaux (later changed to Orleans),
and in default of the convening of a general church council, to convene
a national body of the clergy at Paris on January 10, 1561, the long
interval being allowed in order to permit the Pope to act.[207] In the
meantime the _status quo_ was maintained with reference to the worship
of the Protestants, but for the sake of precaution, an edict was
issued by which all subjects of the realm, whether princes or no, were
prohibited from making any levy of men, arms, armor, horses, or moneys,
on pain of being declared rebels against his majesty.[208]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account