The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
The prosecution of the prince of Condé and the vidame of Chartres was
pushed during the month of November in order to overcome any Huguenot
activity in the coming States-General.[263] The Guises assured both the
Pope and Spain that their intention was, after the execution of the
prince, to send soldiery into the provinces under the command of the
marshals St. André, Termes, Brissac, and Sipierre, whose Catholicism
was of a notoriously militant type, and thus either to crush the
Huguenots, or drive them out of the country.[264] Condé claimed, upon
the advice of his counsel, the advocates Claudius Robert and Francis
Marillac, that as a prince of the blood he had to give account to the
King alone and to judges suitable to his condition, as peers of France,
denying the jurisdiction of the ordinary judges.[265] This the latter
refused to allow, on the ground that there was no appeal from the King
in council (which at least had been the practice of the crown since
Francis I) because the judgment so given was an absolute declaration of
the king’s pleasure; whereupon Condé, after the example of Marchetas,
when condemned by Philip of Macedon, appealed from the King in bad
council to the King in good council. The prince, however, adhered to
his claim, until by a subterfuge he was made, in a way, to commit
himself; for at last he signed an answer _to his counsel_, Robert,
whereby the prosecution gained a point prejudicial to him, although
good lawyers affirmed that a defendant’s counsel could not be made his
judge. Thereupon the government organized a court in which there was
a sprinkling of peers, in order to seem to comply with the law.[266]
Under such practices the judgment was a foregone conclusion, although
even after being declared guilty, the general opinion was that the
prince would not be put to death, but that the worst that could befall
him would be imprisonment in the dungeons of Loches, where Ludovic
Sforza died in the reign of Louis XII; or that he would be kept in
confinement elsewhere pending greater age on the part of the king and
new developments.[267]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account