The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
(Tortorel and Perissin)]
The clergy naturally were in conformity with the canons and the
Catholic ritual. They were declared to be “the organ and mouth” of
France, much history and doctrinal writing being cited to prove their
supremacy. Liberty of election in the matter of church offices,
abolition of the abuse of the _dîme_, which, it was complained, had
been extorted from the church, not once, but four, five, six, and even
nine times in a year, and prelates put in prison for failure to pay, to
the destruction of worship in the churches; suppression of heresy (thus
early stigmatized as _la prétendue réformation_), and royal support
of the authority of the priest-class, were the four demands of the
clerical order.[298] The sittings were rendered less tedious by a bold
attack made upon the persecution of religion by a deputy who demanded
that the Huguenots be permitted to have their own church edifices—a
plea which was reinforced by a hot protest of the admiral Coligny
against an utterance of Quintin, the clerical orator.[299]
As to religion, grave questions arose. Would the toleration of religion
occasion civil war? Would it cause an ultimate alteration of the faith
of France? Would it, finally, alter the state, too? The States-General
refused to enter deeply into these problems. The petition of the
Protestants was not mentioned.[300] In the end it was determined to
grant a general pardon to all throughout the kingdom, without obliging
anyone to retract, or to make any other canonical recantation—a
proposal which was quite at variance with the constitution of the
church and was regarded by Rome as exceeding the bounds of the
authority of the King and his Council, cognizance of matters of this
nature appertaining to ecclesiastics and not to laymen.[301] The
pressure of the third estate as well as the influence of Coligny,
L’Hôpital, and others, is discernible in this measure. For it had been
determined in the Privy Council that should the Council-General not
be held before June, the National Council would assemble in France.
This could not be denied to the estates who demanded it; and this
concession apparently at first caused all the three estates to agree
not to renounce the old religion. To this must be added another reason,
viz., that although the greater part of the clergy, more especially the
bishops, approved the old religion, yet many of the nobility approved
the new one.[302]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account