The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
An even more interested observer, perhaps, of French affairs than
the Pope, was Philip of Spain. The progress of heresy in France, the
seizure of the property of the church there, the attitude of the
French crown toward the Council of Trent, the uncertainty of Antoine
of Bourbon’s conduct—these were all disquieting facts to the Spanish
ruler. Philip curtly told Catherine and her son that her government
must abandon its policy of weakness and dissimulation, that too many
souls were being imperiled by her course, and that coercive measures
must be used.[429] The duke of Alva had the boldness to declare that
unless the government of France revived the rigorous suppressive
measures of Henry II, and punished every heretic, His Catholic Majesty
was resolved to sacrifice the welfare of Spain and even his own life
in order to stamp out a pest which he regarded as menacing to both
France and Spain.[430] Singly and together the bishop of the Limoges
(who was still at the Spanish court) and D’Ozances, while deploring
the malice of the times and “the disasters of which everyone knew,”
tried to justify their government on the ground that Calvinism had
become a necessary evil in France and that it was better to give it
qualified toleration than to plunge the country into fire and war.
They pointed to the deliberations of the assembly of Fontainebleau, to
the States-General of Orleans, to the _arrêts_ of the Parlement, and
the findings of Pontoise and Poissy in proof; they asserted that the
queen mother and the king of Navarre—they were cautious not to style
him thus in Philip’s presence, however—were “of perfect and sincere
intention” not to let heresy increase in France; “the scandal and
outrage” of heretical preaching never would be permitted in Paris or
at the court, although it was necessary to permit the Protestants to
have their own worship outside of some of the towns; that the purpose
of the crown was fixed never to change or alter the true religion; that
France was not hostile to the Council of Trent, but in her distress was
naturally impatient; and finally they importuned the king of Spain not
to show his anger, but to give “advice and comfort” for the sake of the
friendship which existed between their country and his, and for the
repose of Christendom.[431]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account