The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II — John Shaqi
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
The appeal fell upon deaf ears. Philip coldly replied that it was
useless for France to expect the advice or assistance of Spain so long
as her government tolerated heresy in any degree whatsoever; that those
at the court who were Huguenots, like the admiral and the prince of
Condé, should be sent away forthwith, and all others should be coerced;
that from the point of view of religion it was blasphemy to permit the
Huguenots to have any places of worship, and from the political point
of view it was suicide to tolerate them, for “there could never be new
things in religion without loss of obedience to the temporal power,” in
proof of which the King pointed out that in certain of the provinces
of France the people were refusing to pay tithes and taxes, at the
same time triumphantly asserting that he was better informed of things
happening in France than in Spain; that as to the Council of Trent, the
Germans would have nothing to do with it and Spain had no need of it,
while France was torn by heretical controversy, so that it might well
be said that the council sat for the benefit of France alone.[432]
One of the points upon which Philip II dwelt with earnestness in the
interviews he granted the two ambassadors of France was the vicious
education under which Charles IX’s brother Henry, duke of Orleans, was
being brought up. He emphatically condemned the Huguenot environment
of the young prince. It did not seem a coincidence therefore, when a
plot was discovered in November to seize the duke of Orleans—afterward
Henry III—who was to have been made _capo di parti_ by the Catholics.
It was even said the conspirators aimed also to remove the king and
queen of Navarre, Condé, and the admiral, by poison. The duke of
Nemours was charged with being the principal author of it, and was
to have carried the young duke off to Lorraine or Savoy.[433] This
supposition was given greater probability when the whole company of
the Guises suddenly left the court and departed for Lorraine. But
Catherine was not yet intimidated, though she prudently dropped the
investigation which she had set on foot when she discovered clues
that led to the Escurial and the Vatican.[434] In spite of the omens,
she still adhered to a middle course. The government resolved to send
twenty-five bishops and two archbishops to Trent, although they went
“very unwillingly.”[435] At the same time permission was granted to
the ministers of the Reformed churches to preach in private houses
or in gardens environed with houses (the erection of churches being
prohibited), if it was done without tumult.[436] At court the ministers
of the Reformed churches preached one day, when the queen of Navarre,
the prince of Condé, and the admiral would be present. The next
day either some Cordelier, Jesuit, Jacobin, Minim, or other of the
cloistered sects, preached, on which occasion, the King, the queen
mother, the king of Navarre, the cardinal of Ferrara, accompanied
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account