The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and Lancaster — John Shaqi
The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and LancasterEdgar, John G. (John George)
History
The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and Lancaster
Edgar, John G. (John George)
Great Britain -- History -- Wars of the Roses, 1455-1485
The duke, who would seem to have been unaware of the utter insincerity
of his enemies, answered that repeated attempts had been made to effect
his ruin, and that he was in arms for his own safety. The bishops,
who well knew how truly York spoke, admitted that he had been watched
with a jealous eye, but assigned as a reason that the treasonable talk
of his adherents justified suspicion. On the king's part, however,
they acquitted him of all treason, saying that Henry esteemed him
as a true man and well-beloved cousin; and York, maintaining a high
tone, insisted that all persons who had broken the laws of the realm,
especially those who had been indicted for treason, should be put upon
their trial. The demand was so reasonable that compliance could not
with decency be refused; and Henry, having promised that every offender
should be punished, issued an order for the apprehension of Somerset,
and gave York to understand that he should have a place in the council.
Far from doubting the king's good faith, York disbanded his army, and
agreed to a personal interview with his royal kinsman. The result
was not the most satisfactory. It proved beyond question that,
however saintly his theories, Henry was capable of acting with an
utter disregard of honor--that he had little sympathy with the fine
sentiment of his ancestor, John de Valois, who, when advised to violate
a treaty with our third Edward, exclaimed: "Were truth and sincerity
banished from every part of the earth, they ought yet to be found in
the mouths and the hearts of kings." It appears that the queen had
concealed Somerset behind the arras of the king's tent, and no sooner
did York enter, and repeat what he had said to the two bishops, than
the favorite, stepping from behind a curtain, offered to prove his
innocence, and called York liar and traitor.
The scene which followed may easily be imagined. Somerset was violent
and insolent; Henry, alarmed and silent; York, indignant and scornful.
The duke could now entertain no doubt that he had been betrayed;
but his courage did not desert him. He retorted Somerset's epithets
with interest, and was turning haughtily to take his departure, when
informed that he was a captive. Somerset then proposed a summary trial
and execution; but the courtiers shrunk from the opprobrium of another
murder. The king, who, save in the case of Lollards, had no love of
executions, took the more moderate view; and the duke, instead of
perishing on the scaffold, was sent as a state prisoner to the Tower of
London.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account