Chimney sweeps -- Juvenile fiction; Fairy tales -- England
Or suppose again, that you had come, like M. Du Chaillu, a traveller from
unknown parts; and that no human being had ever seen or heard of an
elephant. And suppose that you described him to people, and said, “This
is the shape, and plan, and anatomy of the beast, and of his feet, and of
his trunk, and of his grinders, and of his tusks, though they are not
tusks at all, but two fore teeth run mad; and this is the section of his
skull, more like a mushroom than a reasonable skull of a reasonable or
unreasonable beast; and so forth, and so forth; and though the beast
(which I assure you I have seen and shot) is first cousin to the little
hairy coney of Scripture, second cousin to a pig, and (I suspect)
thirteenth or fourteenth cousin to a rabbit, yet he is the wisest of all
beasts, and can do everything save read, write, and cast accounts.”
People would surely have said, “Nonsense; your elephant is contrary to
nature;” and have thought you were telling stories—as the French thought
of Le Vaillant when he came back to Paris and said that he had shot a
giraffe; and as the king of the Cannibal Islands thought of the English
sailor, when he said that in his country water turned to marble, and rain
fell as feathers. They would tell you, the more they knew of science,
“Your elephant is an impossible monster, contrary to the laws of
comparative anatomy, as far as yet known.” To which you would answer the
less, the more you thought.
Did not learned men, too, hold, till within the last twenty-five years,
that a flying dragon was an impossible monster? And do we not now know
that there are hundreds of them found fossil up and down the world?
People call them Pterodactyles: but that is only because they are ashamed
to call them flying dragons, after denying so long that flying dragons
could exist.
The truth is, that folks’ fancy that such and such things cannot be,
simply because they have not seen them, is worth no more than a savage’s
fancy that there cannot be such a thing as a locomotive, because he never
saw one running wild in the forest. Wise men know that their business is
to examine what is, and not to settle what is not. They know that there
are elephants; they know that there have been flying dragons; and the
wiser they are, the less inclined they will be to say positively that
there are no water-babies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account