There is one decided advantage in giving to the woman the opportunity to
earn her living: she has again acquired thereby significance in the
home, while the generation of women, who neither co-operated
_productively_ in the home nor assumed all the duties of the mother,
were regarded by man with less respect than, on the one side, their
grandmothers who _produced_ all of the household requisites, on the
other side, their now independent self-supporting granddaughters. Only
when society _recompenses the vocation of mother_, can woman find in
this a full equivalent for self-supporting labour.
Another typical group of our time is formed by the numerous women for
whom no choice remains in regard to their work, since it is of a kind
that they must give up because of the removal to another place, or more
frequently because they find so much work in the new home that every
thought of anything further outside must cease. Those who think that
industry has made the work of the wife in the home to-day superfluous,
speak only of the _great cities_, and usually only of _opulent families
in the great cities_, where they are in a position to buy cheaper
everything that the labour of the wife could produce. But in the
country, among all classes, the mother must be the director of the work;
and in all country homes in moderate circumstances—as in countless poor
or not very well-to-do city families—the work of the mother is still
frequently indispensable, and in addition is more economical than her
earnings out of the house could be, especially since the developed
modern woman is usually capable of a more rational housekeeping than the
woman of earlier times.
But while the mothers of that time knew nothing except housework, those
of to-day have often, as unmarried and self-supporting women, enjoyed a
freedom of movement and opportunities of development which, now that
they are over-burdened with household cares, they may seriously miss.
The work of the mother is now still further increased by the difficulty
of getting servants—at least capable ones—and also by the demands of
luxury. The result of this again is that hospitality in the home
decreases, that the watchword of the time, “the windows of the house
wide open to the world, fresh air in the home, no creeping into the
chimney corner,” is so interpreted that warmth and intimacy vanish. Yes,
the overworked mother often herself insists that the family leave the
house and seek some place of recreation for the annual festivals, which
were once the children’s happiest and brightest recollections of home.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account