The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
First, let us explain in a few words how it came about that in a country
like France women were able to assume so important a part. Then, we shall
proceed to show how vast was their effort, how ardent their quest for
happiness, and we shall see why the formula they discovered has not come
down to us.
INTRODUCTION
France is a singular country. We are slightly Greek, half Latin or
Ligurian, very Gallic or very German, and in the West, the country of
an intellectual gulf-stream, we are dreamers—the Celts of M. Legouvé’s
enthusiasm. All of us, whatever our stock, professed in the Middle Ages
to adore women; the author of an old _fabliau_ makes the Virgin ask of
one of our gallant knights the subtle and searching question, “Is thy
lady fairer than I?” But in practice—in other words, in our home life—we
treated women like animals, with the whip.
We must remark also that, during the whole course of the fifteenth
century, France had no time for philosophising: the Hundred Years War
and the awful distresses resulting from it; the iron hand and heavy
taxation of Louis XI., whose rule was regenerative but very severe; then
the Civil War and the Italian expedition—all these circumstances left
us no breathing-space, and are in some measure the justification of an
aftermath of brutality. It was only in the last years of the century that
peace allowed us to reflect, and then activity, prosperity, and happiness
burst out like a lightning-flash. Louis XI., who had clear and definite
rights over France, had dealt with her like a strenuous husband; Louis
XII., who wedded her by chance, treated her with the delicate worship of
a lover who has thrown off the every-day concerns of life.
By what happy chance did the French, till then so apt, whatever they
professed, to value women only on the physical side, take under the
influence of kindly peace and individual well-being a step further
towards the South, and come to think that women might serve as social
guides? The genesis of these ideas was very remarkable.
They came from elsewhere.
During our convalescence, Italy had become transformed. A great
revolution, moral, religious, scientific, and above all aesthetic, had
brought once more upon the arena the two eternal protagonists—the Roman
spiritualists, and the friends of material force, that is, of imperial
Germany.
Men are in general inclined to the side of force; their idea of happiness
consists in imposing their will upon others, no matter how brutally, or
at any rate in donning a uniform—they are born fighters or jockeys.
Women, on the contrary, can only hope to exert direct and effectual
action by the spiritualising of society; and it is not by handing
themselves over to the tender mercies of men, whoever they may
be—husbands, lovers, doctors, hydrotherapists—or by aping the manners and
talk of men, that they acquire their liberty. They are taken at their own
valuation, provided they accentuate their purely feminine qualities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account