The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
For a long time this characteristic sweetness appeared to spring from
gracefulness of form and feature: a face of aristocratic oval; a swan
neck, a wasp waist; in short a general effect of reed-like slightness
and fragility, a veritable mantel ornament, so delicately balanced that
to touch it was more than one dared, and that one was puzzled how so
frail a thing had ever managed to stand on such tiny feet, to hold out
such a poor little hand—a virginal figure of fifteen years.[171] This
wonderfully pure ideal persisted in Spain; but in Italy one of the
first signs of decadence was the preference for more sensual forms.
The Florentines, with their fastidious ideal of elegance, were almost
alone in resisting the current; good Firenzuola did not yield to it to
any extent, and at most there was at Florence a small section in favour
of muscle and robustness, of whom Michelangelo is the representative.
But at Venice, a fine opulence of flesh, luminous and warm, wonderfully
substantial and soft, “full of a delicious comfortableness,” carried all
before it—a beauty such as the pagans have celebrated in their lyrics and
such as the East adores: nothing seemed more charming.
In France, the national spirit, always eclectic and vacillating, was
neither idealistic nor materialistic enough to take any side in this
dispute.
Autant me plaist la grassette,
Comme me plaist la maigrette.[172]
—_Ronsard._
The great goddesses who ruled and dominated the classical epoch, Madame
de Chateaubriand, Madame de Canaples,[173] Diana of Poitiers, were
representatives of vigorous stocks; an old lusty blood coursed visibly
enough through their veins; but they mastered it as they mastered
everything, diluting it with an effeminacy which had, however, a charm of
its own.
The colour of the hair and eyebrows always appeared a characteristic
factor in a woman’s expression; without fair hair there was no charm.
According to a twelfth-century chronicler, the sweet Saint Godeliva
of Bruges was called a “horrid crow” by her hag of a stepmother on
account of her dusky hair; it was to her hair indeed that she owed
the tribulations that won for her the aureole of sainthood. In all
probability the dukes of Burgundy, when they created the order of the
Golden Fleece, were thinking rather of the charming women with heads like
a golden harvest-field than of the exploits of Jason. It is impossible to
imagine Botticelli crowning Spring with black, or Raphael representing
his Virgins as goddesses of night. The blonde had it all her own way.
And yet even in this matter the fastidious Florentines did not commit
themselves, and had something to say for the pretty dainty little dark
heads that were to be met in the fields of Umbria. In France the chestnut
locks which set off so many charming faces were greatly admired.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account