The Wonderful Story of Washington: and the Meaning of His Life for the Youth and Patriotism of AmericaStevens, C. M. (Charles McClellan)
History
The Wonderful Story of Washington: and the Meaning of His Life for the Youth and Patriotism of America
Stevens, C. M. (Charles McClellan)
Washington, George, 1732-1799 -- Juvenile literature
Washington had started with his message from Governor Dinwiddie on
October 30, and he returned with the reply, January 16. The long
journey through the trackless forests of the winter wilderness had
been one of almost incredible hardship and peril, where his life many
times appeared hopeless, but he won out and performed his mission. It
is probable that nothing throughout his wonderful career was more
trying to his character or more evidence of his indomitable manhood.
One who was able to perform successfully such a mission, and bring
back such a clear view of the situation, was henceforth to be rated as
one of the worthiest sons of Virginia, and a reliable guardian of her
fortunes.
II. ALARM FOR THE FUTURE
Washington’s journal, covering his journey and his observations, was
printed, and it awakened the colonies to the fact that, if the French
took possession of the Ohio Valley, the English would have no future
beyond the Alleghenies. The French commander’s evasive reply, coupled
with his statement that he was there by his superior’s orders and
would obey them to the letter, made it plain that, however much the
two home countries were at peace, the American colonies would have to
fight for their rights, as they conceived them to be, in these Western
regions. As is to be seen, this colonial English war with the colonial
French was destined to accomplish three far-reaching results. It would
unite the English colonies, it would give them an extended view of
their human rights, and it would develop a leader in George
Washington.
At first the support given the Governor, even in Virginia, was very
meagerly and grudgingly given.
“Those who offered to enlist,” says Washington, “were for the most
part loose, idle persons, without house or home, some without shoes or
stockings, some shirtless, and many without coat or waistcoat.”
One of the French officers had boasted to Washington that the French
would be the first to take possession of the Ohio lands, because the
English were so slow, and it proved true.
Captain Trent had been sent with about fifty men to build a fort at
the fork of the Ohio River, the place recommended by Washington. But,
when it was less than half done, a thousand Frenchmen appeared and
ordered the English fort-builders to leave. They were glad to have
that privilege. A few days after Washington arrived at Will’s creek,
with probably two hundred men, the fort-builders came in and told
their story.
It was known that the French had abundance of war-supplies, could
receive reinforcements on short notice, were already at least five to
one in numbers, and had the assured support of at least six hundred
Indians.
Washington’s men were undisciplined, and Trent’s men being volunteers
for other service were insubordinate. There were no supplies, and
reinforcements were doubtful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account