The Wonders of Life: A Popular Study of Biological PhilosophyHaeckel, Ernst
Philosophy
The Wonders of Life: A Popular Study of Biological Philosophy
Haeckel, Ernst
Biology; Evolution (Biology); Life -- Origin
the movements of inorganic │ specifically different from
dynamos. │ all inorganic movements.
│
8. Sensation is a general form │ 8. The sensation of organisms
of the energy of substance, │ can only be explained by
not specifically different │ ascribing a soul to them,
in sensitive organisms and │ an immaterial, immortal
irritable inorganic objects │ being that only dwells for
(such as powder, dynamite). │ a time in the body. After
There is no such │ death this spirit lives an
thing as an immaterial │ independent life.
soul. │
III
MIRACLES
Miracle and natural law--Belief in miracles of savages (fetichism),
of semi-civilized (idolatry), of civilized (theism), and of
educated people (dualism)--Religious belief in miracles--Apostles'
Creed--Article relating to creation--Article relating to
redemption--Article relating to immortality--Philosophic belief in
miracles--Academic thinkers and Free-thinkers--Dualism of Plato
and Kant--Belief in miracles in the nineteenth century, in modern
metaphysics, theology, and politics.
In ordinary parlance the word "miracle" means a number of different
things. We say a phenomenon is miraculous or wonderful[5] when we
cannot explain it and trace its causes. But we say a natural object
or a work of art is wonderful when it is unusually beautiful and
imposing--when it passes the ordinary limits of our experience. In this
work I do not take the word in this relative sense, but in the absolute
sense in which a phenomenon is said to transcend the limits of natural
law and lie beyond the range of rational explanation. In this sense
it means the same as "supernatural" or "transcendental." We can know
natural phenomena by our reason and bring them within our cognizance.
The miraculous can only be accepted on faith.
The belief in supernatural miracles is in contradiction to pure reason,
which lays the foundations of all science. Kant, who won so great a
vogue for the term "pure reason," understood by this originally "reason
as independent of experience." The phrase was used in a narrower sense
subsequently to express independence of dogma and prejudice, as the
base of pure and unprejudiced science. In this sense we oppose pure
reason to superstition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account