The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 17Dryden, John
General
The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 17
Dryden, John
English literature
absurd to him on the other side; for there is a kind of positiveness in
granting nothing to be more likely on one part than on another, which
his Academy avoided by inclining the balance to that hand where the
most weighty reasons, and probability of truth, were visible. The moral
philosophy, therefore, was his chiefest aim, because the principles of
it admitted of less doubt; and because they were most conducing to the
benefit of human life. For, after the example of Socrates, he had found,
that the speculations of natural philosophy were more delightful than
solid and profitable; that they were abstruse and thorny, and much of
sophism in the solution of appearances:—that the mathematics, indeed,
could reward his pains with many demonstrations, but though they made
him wiser, they made him not more virtuous, and therefore attained not
the end of happiness: for which reason, though he had far advanced in
that study, yet he made it but his recreation, not his business. Some
problem of it was his usual divertisement at supper, which he mingled
also with pleasant and more light discourses; for he was no sour
philosopher, but passed his time as merrily as he could, with reference
to virtue. He forgot not to be pleasant while he instructed, and
entertained his friends with so much cheerfulness and good humour, that
his learning was not nauseous to them; neither were they afraid of his
company another time. He was not so austere as to despise riches, but,
being in possession of a large fortune, he lived, though not splendidly,
yet plentifully; and suffered not his friends to want that part of his
estate which he thought superfluous to a philosopher.
The religion he professed, to speak the worst of it, was heathen. I say,
the religion he _professed_; for it is no way probable that so great a
philosopher, and so wise a man, should believe the superstitions and
fopperies of Paganism; but that he accommodated himself to the use and
received customs of his country. He was indeed a priest of Apollo, as
himself acknowledges; but that proves him not to have been a Polytheist.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account