The Works of Sir Thomas Browne, Volume 2Browne, Thomas, Sir
Religion
The Works of Sir Thomas Browne, Volume 2
Browne, Thomas, Sir
Christianity; Ethics; Religion and medicine
That there is but one Phœnix in the World, which after many hundred
years burneth it self, and from the ashes thereof ariseth up another, is
a conceit not new or altogether popular, but of great Antiquity; not
only delivered by humane Authors, but frequently expressed also by holy
Writers; by _Cyril_, _Epiphanius_, and others, by _Ambrose_ in his
Hexameron, and _Tertullian_ in his Poem _De Judicio Domini_; but more
agreeably unto the present sense, in his excellent Tract, _De
Resurrectione carnis_. _Illum dico alitem orientis peculiarem, de
singularitate famosum, de posteritate monstruosum; qui semetipsum
libenter funerans renovat, natali fine decedens, atque succedens iterum
Phœnix. Ubi jam nemo, iterum ipse; quia non jam, alius idem._ The
Scripture also seems to favour it, particularly that of _Job_ 21. In the
interpretation of _Beda_, _Dicebam in nidulo meo moriar, et sicut Phœnix
multiplicabo dies_: and _Psal._ 31. δίκαιος ὥσπερ φοῖνιξ ἀνθήσει, _vir
justus ut Phœnix florebit_, as _Tertullian_ renders it, and so also
expounds it in his Book before alledged.
[Sidenote: _Against the story of the Phœnix._]
All which notwithstanding, we cannot presume the existence of this
Animal; nor dare we affirm there is any Phœnix in Nature. For, first
there wants herein the definitive confirmator and test of things
uncertain, that is, the sense of man. For though many Writers have much
enlarged hereon, yet is there not any ocular describer, or such as
presumeth to confirm it upon aspection. And therefore _Herodotus_ that
led the story unto the _Greeks_, plainly saith, he never attained the
sight of any, but only in the picture.
Again, Primitive Authors, and from whom the stream of relations is
derivative, deliver themselves very dubiously; and either by a doubtful
parenthesis, or a timorous conclusion overthrow the whole relation. Thus
_Herodotus_ in his _Euterpe_, delivering the story hereof, presently
interposeth, ἐμοὶ μὲν οὐ πίστα λέγοντες; that is, which account seems to
me improbable. _Tacitus_ in his annals affordeth a larger story, how the
Phœnix was first seen at _Heliopolis_ in the reign of _Sesostris_, then
in the reign of _Amasis_, after in the days of _Ptolomy_, the third of
the _Macedonian_ race; but at last thus determineth, _Sed Antiquitas
obscura, et nonnulli falsum esse hunc Phœnicem neque Arabum è terris
credidere_. _Pliny_ makes yet a fairer story, that the Phœnix flew into
_Egypt_ in the Consulship of _Quintus Plancius_, that it was brought to
Rome in the Censorship of _Claudius_, in the eight hundred year of the
City, and testified also in their records; but after all concludeth,
_Sed quæ falsa nemo dubitabit_, As we read it in the fair and ancient
impression of _Brixia_; as _Aldrovandus_ hath quoted it, and as it is
found in the manuscript Copy, as _Dalechampius_ hath also noted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account