The Works of William Shakespeare [Cambridge Edition] [Vol. 8 of 9]Shakespeare, William
General
The Works of William Shakespeare [Cambridge Edition] [Vol. 8 of 9]
Shakespeare, William
English drama
which of course is an accidental corruption, by displacement of the
type, of 'myrackles' (i.e. 'miracles') the true reading. In the
corrected copies of Q₂ this is altered, apparently by the printer's
conjecture, to 'my wracke', which is also the reading of Q₁. Throughout
the sheet in which this occurs the readings of Q₁ agree with the
corrected copies of Q₂, and had it not been for the instance quoted, we
might have supposed that the corrections in the latter were made from
Q₁. But the corruption 'my rackles' for 'miracles' must have come from
the original MS., and 'my wracke' is only a conjectural emendation, so
that the order of succession in this sheet at least appears to be the
following. First the uncorrected copy of Q₂, then the same corrected,
and lastly Q₁. On the other hand it is remarkable that Q₁, if printed
from Q₂ at all, must have been printed from a copy made up, with the
exception just mentioned from II. 1. 128 to II. 4. 133, and another
containing from IV. 6. 224 to V. 3. 64, of uncorrected sheets. Another
hypothesis which might be made is that Q₁ and Q₂ were printed from the
same manuscript, and that the printer of Q₁ corrupted 'miracles' into
'my wracke', while the printer of Q₂ made it 'my rackles', which was
afterwards altered by a reference to Q₁. The question, however, is
very difficult to decide, and at most is one rather of bibliographical
curiosity than of critical importance. We may mention that, without
giving the reasons for his conclusion, Jennens, in his edition of
_Lear_ in 1770, quotes as the 1st Quarto that which we have called Q₂
and vice versa.
A third Quarto, which we have called Q₃, was printed very carelessly
page for page from Q₁ and published in 1655.
In the first Folio _King Lear_ was printed from an independent
manuscript, and its text is on the whole much superior to that of the
Quartos. Each however supplies passages which are wanting in the other.
Capell appears to have prepared the play for press in the first
instance from Pope's first edition. The manuscript readings and stage
directions, marked in his copy of that edition but not adopted in his
own, we have quoted as 'Capell MS'.
* * * * *
3. OTHELLO was first printed in Quarto in 1622 with the following title:
THE | Tragœdy of Othello, | The Moore of Venice. | _As it
hath beene diuerse times acted at the_ | Globe, and at the
Black-Friers, by | _his Maiesties Seruants_. | _Written by_
William Shakespeare. | _LONDON_,| Printed by _N. O._ for
_Thomas Walkley_, and are to be sold at his | shop, at the
Eagle and Child, in Brittans Bursse. | 1622. |
To this edition which we call Q₁, the following preface was affixed by
the publisher:
The Stationer to the Reader.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account