This leading characteristic of dream life--the fact that it takes
place in another and more shadowy world and in a different kind of
consciousness[2]--has led to the criticism of the study of dreams from
the scientific side. We cannot really study our dreams, these objectors
say, because we--that is to say, our waking consciousness--cannot come
sufficiently closely in contact with them. Dreams, it is argued, are
inevitably transformed in our hands; what we are studying is not our
dreams, but only our waking, and probably altogether false, impressions
of our dreams. There is a certain element of truth in this objection. It
is very difficult, indeed impossible, to recall exactly, and in their
proper order, even the details of a real adventure which has only just
happened to us. It is, obviously, incomparably more difficult to recall an
experience which took place, under such shadowy conditions, in a world so
remote from the world of waking life. There is, further, the very definite
difficulty that we only catch our dreams for a moment by the light, as
it were, of the open door as we are emerging from sleep. In other words,
our waking consciousness is for a moment observing and interpreting a
process in another kind of consciousness, or even if we assert that it is
the same consciousness it is still a consciousness that has been working
under quite different conditions from waking consciousness, and accepting
data which in the waking state it would not accept. For the student
of dreams it must ever be a serious question how far the facts become
inevitably distorted in this process. Sleeping or waking, it is probable,
our consciousness never embraces the whole of the possible psychic field
within us. There are, when we are dreaming as well as when we are
awake--as will become clearer in the sequel--subconscious, or imperfectly
conscious, states just below our consciousness, and exerting an influence
upon it.[3] Our latent psychic possessions, among which dreams move, would
seem to be by no means always at the same depth; the specific gravity of
consciousness, as it were, varies, and these latent elements rise or fall,
becoming nearer to the conscious surface or falling further away from it.
But the greatest change must take place when the waking surface is reached
and the outer world breaks on sleeping consciousness. In that change
there is doubtless a process of necessary and automatic transformation
and interpretation. We may picture it, perhaps, as somewhat the same
process as when a person skilled in both languages takes up a foreign book
and reads it out in his own tongue. With practice the reader may become
unconscious that he is transforming everything, that the words he utters
are different from the words he sees, and that he even transposes their
order, sometimes putting in the middle of a sentence the verb he sees at
the end.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account