Science fiction, English -- History and criticism; Wells, H. G. (Herbert George), 1866-1946 -- Criticism and interpretation
The line of human improvements and the expansion of human
life lies in the direction of education and finer
initiatives. If humanity cannot develop an education far
beyond anything that is now provided, if it cannot
collectively invent devices and solve problems on a much
richer, broader scale than it does at the present time, it
cannot hope to achieve any very much finer order or any more
general happiness than it now enjoys. We must believe,
therefore, that it can develop such a training and
education, or we must abandon secular constructive hope. And
here my initial difficulty as against crude democracy comes
in. If humanity at large is capable of that high education
and those creative freedoms our hope demands, much more must
its better and more vigorous types be so capable. And if
those who have power and scope and freedom to respond to
imaginative appeals cannot be won to the idea of collective
self-development, then the whole of humanity cannot be won
to that. From that one passes to what has become my general
conception in politics, the conception of the constructive
imagination working upon the vast complex of powerful
people, enterprising people, influential people, amidst whom
power is diffused to-day, to produce that self-conscious,
highly selective, open-minded, devoted, aristocratic
culture, which seems to me to be the necessary next phase in
the development of human affairs. I see human progress, not
as the spontaneous product of crowds of low minds swayed by
elementary needs, but as a natural but elaborate result of
intricate human interdependencies, of human energy and
curiosity liberated and acting at leisure, of human passions
and motives, modified and redirected by literature and art.
This permeation of the head men of the world, this creation of a natural
collective-minded aristocracy appears now to be the permanent hope of
Wells. It is the stuff of all his novels, it is the centre of his
ethical system; and his _Utopia_ is made possible by the existence in it
of just such a flexible leading caste--the so-called Samurai. But
before coming to the inner implications of this, to the individual and
personal realities and difficulties of this, I must follow the
development of the idea in Wells himself. At various times, in various
works, he has presented it from a dozen different angles: as something
that is certain to come, as something he greatly desires to come, as
something that will not come at all except through prodigious effort, as
something that will come through a general catastrophe, as something
that will come through isolated individual endeavor, and the like. That
is to say he has presented his idea through all the various literary
mediums of exposition, fable, prophecy, psychological analysis, and
ethical appeal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account