Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
5. Now, if our having shown above that Christ possessed a rational soul
should cause a difficulty to any one, seeing we have frequently proved
throughout all our discussions that the nature of souls is capable both
of good and evil, the difficulty will be explained in the following way.
That the nature, indeed, of His soul was the same as that of all others
cannot be doubted, otherwise it could not be called a soul were it not
truly one. But since the power of choosing good and evil is within the
reach of all, this soul which belonged to Christ elected to love
righteousness, so that in proportion to the immensity of its love it
clung to it unchangeably and inseparably, so that firmness of purpose,
and immensity of affection, and an inextinguishable warmth of love,
destroyed all susceptibility (_sensum_) for alteration and change; and
that which formerly depended upon the will was changed by the power of
long custom into nature; and so we must believe that there existed in
Christ a human and rational soul, without supposing that it had any
feeling or possibility of sin.
6. To explain the matter more fully, it will not appear absurd to make
use of an illustration, although on a subject of so much difficulty it
is not easy to obtain suitable illustrations. However, if we may speak
without offence, the metal iron is capable of cold and heat. If, then, a
mass of iron be kept constantly in the fire, receiving the heat through
all its pores and veins, and the fire being continuous and the iron
never removed from it, it become wholly converted into the latter; could
we at all say of this, which is by nature a mass of iron, that when
placed in the fire, and incessantly burning, it was at any time capable
of admitting cold? On the contrary, because it is more consistent with
truth, do we not rather say, what we often see happening in furnaces,
that it has become wholly fire, seeing nothing but fire is visible in
it? And if any one were to attempt to touch or handle it, he would
experience the action not of iron, but of fire. In this way, then, that
soul which, like an iron in the fire, has been perpetually placed in the
Word, and perpetually in the Wisdom, and perpetually in God,[239] is God
in all that it does, feels, and understands, and therefore can be called
neither convertible nor mutable, inasmuch as, being incessantly heated,
it possessed immutability from its union with the Word of God. To all
the saints, finally, some warmth from the Word of God must be supposed
to have passed; and in this soul the divine fire itself must be believed
to have rested, from which some warmth may have passed to others.
Lastly, the expression, “God, thy God, anointed thee with the oil of
gladness above thy fellows,”[240] shows that that soul is anointed in
one way with the oil of gladness, _i.e._ with the word of God and
wisdom; and his fellows, _i.e._ the holy prophets and apostles, in
another. For they are said to have “run in the odour of his
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account