Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
by appellations of divine dignity. More truly indeed of this than of any
other can the statement be affirmed, “They shall both be in one flesh,
and are no longer two, but one flesh.”[230] For the Word of God is to be
considered as being more in one flesh with the soul than a man with his
wife. But to whom is it more becoming to be also one spirit with God,
than to this soul which has so joined itself to God by love as that it
may justly be said to be one spirit with Him?
4. That the perfection of his love and the sincerity of his deserved
affection[231] formed for it this inseparable union with God, so that
the assumption of that soul was not accidental, or the result of a
personal preference, but was conferred as the reward of its virtues,
listen to the prophet addressing it thus: “Thou hast loved
righteousness, and hated wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath
anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.”[232] As a
reward for its love, then, it is anointed with the oil of gladness;
_i.e._ the soul of Christ along with the Word of God is made Christ.
Because to be anointed with the oil of gladness means nothing else than
to be filled with the Holy Spirit. And when it is said “above thy
fellows,” it is meant that the grace of the Spirit was not given to it
as to the prophets, but that the essential fulness of the Word of God
Himself was in it, according to the saying of the apostle, “In whom
dwelt all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.”[233] Finally, on this
account he has not only said, “Thou hast loved righteousness;” but he
adds, “and Thou hast hated wickedness.” For to have hated wickedness is
what the Scripture says of Him, that “He did no sin, neither was any
guile found in His mouth,”[234] and that “He was tempted in all things
like as we are, without sin.”[235] Nay, the Lord Himself also said,
“Which of you will convince me of sin?”[236] And again He says with
reference to Himself, “Behold, the prince of this world cometh, and
findeth nothing in me.”[237] All which [passages] show that in Him there
was no sense of sin; and that the prophet might show more clearly that
no sense of sin had ever entered into Him, he says, “Before the boy
could have knowledge to call upon father or mother, He turned away from
wickedness.”[238]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account